linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] perf intel-pt: Use itrace error flags to suppress some errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 9 Jul 2020 21:13:38 +0300
From:   Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] perf intel-pt: Use itrace error flags to suppress
 some errors

On 9/07/20 8:50 pm, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:36:22PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> The itrace "e" option may be followed by a number which has the
>> following effect for Intel PT:
>> 	1	Suppress overflow events
>> 	2	Suppress trace data lost events
>> The values may be combined by bitwise OR'ing them.
>>
>> Suppressing those errors can be useful for testing and debugging
>> because they are not due to decoding.
> 
> I suspect it will be useful to more than just decoding and debugging.
> 
> But the number is not a nice user interface.
> 
> How about e[....] 
> 
> like e[ol] 

Do you mean literally square-brackets? If you were really unlucky you might
get pathname expansion with that.

> 
> Also it's a bit unusual that this disables instead of enables, but ok.
> 
> -Andi
>