linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones: YAMA SECURITY MODULE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202007091129.7D0E2534D2@keescook>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jul 2020 11:31:58 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>
Cc:     corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones: YAMA SECURITY MODULE

On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:45:14AM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
> And as it's the only URL here, of course the whole patch makes no sense
> anymore. If I'd replace the URL as you said, I'd make a *new patch* with a
> *new title* and just send it --in-reply-to here. And my statement "just
> forget [the old] patch" would still stand.

We must be talking past each other. The doc has 2 links. You suggested
changing one, I suggested also changing the other.

> Also IMAO in this particular case *I don't deserve* to be the author of the
> new patch as *you did all the work* for it – i.e. figured out the
> replacement URL.

That's fine -- I'm mainly interested in just getting the document
improved. I will send a v2...

-- 
Kees Cook