[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709223802.GY2005@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:38:02 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] xfs: Fix false positive lockdep warning with
sb_internal & fs_reclaim
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 03:16:29PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> One way to avoid this splat is to add GFP_NOFS to the affected allocation
> calls by using the memalloc_nofs_save()/memalloc_nofs_restore() pair.
> This shouldn't matter unless the system is really running out of memory.
> In that particular case, the filesystem freeze operation may fail while
> it was succeeding previously.
>
> Without this patch, the command sequence below will show that the lock
> dependency chain sb_internal -> fs_reclaim exists.
>
> # fsfreeze -f /home
> # fsfreeze --unfreeze /home
> # grep -i fs_reclaim -C 3 /proc/lockdep_chains | grep -C 5 sb_internal
>
> After applying the patch, such sb_internal -> fs_reclaim lock dependency
> chain can no longer be found. Because of that, the locking dependency
> warning will not be shown.
>
> Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Looks good. Thanks for working through this, Waiman.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists