[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e231263a-76f8-326a-ae47-0ae785137c9a@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:00:48 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: perf/core] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature
bit
On 7/8/20 2:51 AM, tip-bot2 for Kan Liang wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 02dabc9..72ba4c5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR (18*32+10) /* VERW clears CPU buffers */
> #define X86_FEATURE_TSX_FORCE_ABORT (18*32+13) /* "" TSX_FORCE_ABORT */
> #define X86_FEATURE_PCONFIG (18*32+18) /* Intel PCONFIG */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR (18*32+19) /* Intel ARCH LBR */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL (18*32+26) /* "" Speculation Control (IBRS + IBPB) */
> #define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_STIBP (18*32+27) /* "" Single Thread Indirect Branch Predictors */
> #define X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D (18*32+28) /* Flush L1D cache */
Are architectural LBRs useful *without* XSAVE? If not, should we add an
entry in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c::cpuid_deps[] for this?
...
{ X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES },
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists