lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e231263a-76f8-326a-ae47-0ae785137c9a@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Jul 2020 16:00:48 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip: perf/core] x86/cpufeatures: Add Architectural LBRs feature
 bit

On 7/8/20 2:51 AM, tip-bot2 for Kan Liang wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 02dabc9..72ba4c5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -366,6 +366,7 @@
>  #define X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR		(18*32+10) /* VERW clears CPU buffers */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_TSX_FORCE_ABORT	(18*32+13) /* "" TSX_FORCE_ABORT */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_PCONFIG		(18*32+18) /* Intel PCONFIG */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR		(18*32+19) /* Intel ARCH LBR */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL		(18*32+26) /* "" Speculation Control (IBRS + IBPB) */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_INTEL_STIBP		(18*32+27) /* "" Single Thread Indirect Branch Predictors */
>  #define X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D		(18*32+28) /* Flush L1D cache */

Are architectural LBRs useful *without* XSAVE?  If not, should we add an
entry in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c::cpuid_deps[] for this?

...
        { X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR,            X86_FEATURE_XSAVES    },
...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ