[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709061409.GA130260@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:14:09 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>
Cc: stern@...land.harvard.edu, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones: USB MASS STORAGE
DRIVER
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 08:41:54PM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.07.20 um 12:39 schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 11:55:00AM +0200, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
> > > Rationale:
> > > Reduces attack surface on kernel devs opening the links for MITM
> > > as HTTPS traffic is much harder to manipulate.
> > >
> > > Deterministic algorithm:
> > > For each file:
> > > If not .svg:
> > > For each line:
> > > If doesn't contain `\bxmlns\b`:
> > > For each link, `\bhttp://[^# \t\r\n]*(?:\w|/)`:
> > > If neither `\bgnu\.org/license`, nor `\bmozilla\.org/MPL\b`:
> > > If both the HTTP and HTTPS versions
> > > return 200 OK and serve the same content:
> > > Replace HTTP with HTTPS.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexander A. Klimov <grandmaster@...klimov.de>
> >
> > Your subject lines are very odd compared to all patches for this
> > subsystem, as well as all other kernel subsystems. Any reason you are
> > doing it this way and not the normal and standard method of:
> > USB: storage: replace http links with https
> >
> > That would look more uniform as well as not shout at anyone.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
> Hi,
>
> I'm very sorry.
>
> As Torvalds has merged 93431e0607e5 and many of you devs (including big
> maintainers like David Miller) just applied this stuff, I assumed that's OK.
>
> And now I've rolled out tens of patches via shell loop... *sigh*
>
> As this is the third (I think) change request like this, I assume this rule
> applies to all subsystems – right?
Yes, you should try to emulate what the subsystem does, look at other
patches for the same files, but the format I suggested is almost always
the correct one. If not, I'm sure maintainers will be glad to tell you
otherwise :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists