[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709071714.32m7hatmkr4pk2f4@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 09:17:14 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>
Cc: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"Luis Claudio R . Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Mahipal Challa <mahipalreddy2006@...il.com>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...hat.com>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>,
"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/zswap: move to use crypto_acomp API for hardware
acceleration
On 2020-07-08 21:45:47 [+0000], Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
> > On 2020-07-08 00:52:10 [+1200], Barry Song wrote:
> > > @@ -127,9 +129,17 @@
> > > +struct crypto_acomp_ctx {
> > > + struct crypto_acomp *acomp;
> > > + struct acomp_req *req;
> > > + struct crypto_wait wait;
> > > + u8 *dstmem;
> > > + struct mutex mutex;
> > > +};
> > …
> > > @@ -1074,12 +1138,32 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_store(unsigned
> > type, pgoff_t offset,
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* compress */
> > > - dst = get_cpu_var(zswap_dstmem);
> > > - tfm = *get_cpu_ptr(entry->pool->tfm);
> > > - src = kmap_atomic(page);
> > > - ret = crypto_comp_compress(tfm, src, PAGE_SIZE, dst, &dlen);
> > > - kunmap_atomic(src);
> > > - put_cpu_ptr(entry->pool->tfm);
> > > + acomp_ctx = *this_cpu_ptr(entry->pool->acomp_ctx);
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> > > +
> > > + src = kmap(page);
> > > + dst = acomp_ctx->dstmem;
> >
> > that mutex is per-CPU, per-context. The dstmem pointer is per-CPU. So if
> > I read this right, you can get preempted after crypto_wait_req() and
> > another context in this CPU writes its data to the same dstmem and then…
> >
>
> This isn't true. Another thread in this cpu will be blocked by the mutex.
> It is impossible for two threads to write the same dstmem.
> If thread1 ran on cpu1, it held cpu1's mutex; if another thread wants to run on cpu1, it is blocked.
> If thread1 ran on cpu1 first, it held cpu1's mutex, then it migrated to cpu2 (with very rare chance)
> a. if another thread wants to run on cpu1, it is blocked;
How it is blocked? That "struct crypto_acomp_ctx" is
"this_cpu_ptr(entry->pool->acomp_ctx)" - which is per-CPU of a pool
which you can have multiple of. But `dstmem' you have only one per-CPU
no matter have many pools you have.
So pool1 on CPU1 uses the same `dstmem' as pool2 on CPU1. But pool1 and
pool2 on CPU1 use a different mutex for protection of this `dstmem'.
> Thanks
> Barry
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists