[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff7985a4-58be-b466-62c2-abce9ae1c0f0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:38:26 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] gpio: max77620: Don't set of_node
09.07.2020 12:07, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:44 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
>> 08.07.2020 23:57, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
>>> On Wednesday, July 8, 2020, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com
>>> <mailto:digetx@...il.com>> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> I gave a second look and I think my suggestion is wrong. Here is an
>>> interesting propagation of the parent device node to its grand son,
>>> leaving son’s one untouched. Original code has intentions to do that way.
>>
>> The [1] says that gpio_chip.parent should point at the "device providing
>> the GPIOs".
>
> Yes, physical device I believe.
>
>> That's the pdev->dev.parent in the case of this driver.
>> MAX77620 is an MFD PMIC device that has virtual sub-devices like GPIO
>> controller, PINCTRL and RTC. The MFD is the parent device that provides
>> the GPIOs [2].
>>
>> [1]
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.8-rc3/source/include/linux/gpio/driver.h#L276
>>
>> [2]
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.8-rc3/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi#L48
>>
>> I think the old code was wrong and this patch is correct, please correct
>> me if I'm missing something.
>
> Hmm... I have checked through GPIO drivers I have knowledge of / care
> about and PMIC ones do like you suggested in this patch, the rest
> (which are instantiated from MFD) take a virtual platform device.
>
> Looking at DT excerpt I think you're rather right than wrong, so I
> leave it to you and maintainers.
> Thanks!
Okay, waiting for the maintainers then :)
Thank you very much for the review!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists