| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200709123011.GA18734@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 22:30:11 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
arnd@...db.de, emil.l.velikov@...il.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
keescook@...omium.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lkp@...el.com, rikard.falkeborn@...il.com, syednwaris@...il.com,
vilhelm.gray@...il.com, yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] linux/bits.h: fix unsigned less than zero warnings
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com> wrote:
> When calling the GENMASK and GENMASK_ULL macros with zero lower bit and
> an unsigned unknown high bit, some gcc versions warn due to the
> comparisons of the high and low bit in GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK.
>
> To silence the warnings, only perform the check if both inputs are
> known. This does not trigger any warnings, from the Wtype-limits help:
>
> Warn if a comparison is always true or always false due to the
> limited range of the data type, but do not warn for constant
> expressions.
>
> As an example of the warning, kindly reported by the kbuild test robot:
>
> from drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c:11:
> drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c: In function 'atmel_smc_cs_encode_ncycles':
> include/linux/bits.h:26:28: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
> 26 | __builtin_constant_p((l) > (h)), (l) > (h), 0)))
> | ^
> include/linux/build_bug.h:16:62: note: in definition of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO'
> 16 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); })))
> | ^
> include/linux/bits.h:39:3: note: in expansion of macro 'GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK'
> 39 | (GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/mfd/atmel-smc.c:49:25: note: in expansion of macro 'GENMASK'
> 49 | unsigned int lsbmask = GENMASK(msbpos - 1, 0);
> | ^~~~~~~
>
> Fixes: 295bcca84916 ("linux/bits.h: add compile time sanity check of GENMASK inputs")
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
> Reported-by: Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
> ---
> v3-v4
> Added Emils Reviewed-by.
I'm still getting the same warning even with the patch, for example:
CC [M] drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.o
CHECK ../drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel_hash.c
In file included from ../include/linux/bits.h:23,
from ../include/linux/bitops.h:5,
from ../include/linux/kernel.h:12,
from ../include/linux/clk.h:13,
from ../drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:8:
../drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c: In function \u2018safexcel_hw_init\u2019:
../include/linux/bits.h:27:7: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
(l) > (h), 0)))
^
../include/linux/build_bug.h:16:62: note: in definition of macro \u2018BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO\u2019
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); })))
^
../include/linux/bits.h:40:3: note: in expansion of macro \u2018GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK\u2019
(GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:649:11: note: in expansion of macro \u2018GENMASK\u2019
GENMASK(priv->config.rings - 1, 0),
^~~~~~~
../include/linux/bits.h:27:7: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
(l) > (h), 0)))
^
../include/linux/build_bug.h:16:62: note: in definition of macro \u2018BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO\u2019
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); })))
^
../include/linux/bits.h:40:3: note: in expansion of macro \u2018GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK\u2019
(GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:757:35: note: in expansion of macro \u2018GENMASK\u2019
writel(EIP197_DxE_THR_CTRL_EN | GENMASK(priv->config.rings - 1, 0),
^~~~~~~
../include/linux/bits.h:27:7: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
(l) > (h), 0)))
^
../include/linux/build_bug.h:16:62: note: in definition of macro \u2018BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO\u2019
#define BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(e) ((int)(sizeof(struct { int:(-!!(e)); })))
^
../include/linux/bits.h:40:3: note: in expansion of macro \u2018GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK\u2019
(GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK(h, l) + __GENMASK(h, l))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/crypto/inside-secure/safexcel.c:761:35: note: in expansion of macro \u2018GENMASK\u2019
writel(EIP197_DxE_THR_CTRL_EN | GENMASK(priv->config.rings - 1, 0),
^~~~~~~
This happens when only l is const but h isn't.
Can we please just revert the original patch and work this out in
the next release?
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists