lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 07:58:58 -0600 From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: remove dead bdi congestion leftovers On 7/8/20 11:32 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:14:29PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 7/1/20 3:06 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Hi Jens, >>> >>> we have a lot of bdi congestion related code that is left around without >>> any use. This series removes it in preparation of sorting out the bdi >>> lifetime rules properly. >> >> Please run series like this through a full compilation, for both this one >> and the previous series I had to fix up issues like this: >> >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function ‘bch_cached_dev_request_init’: >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1233:18: warning: unused variable ‘g’ [-Wunused-variable] >> 1233 | struct gendisk *g = dc->disk.disk; >> | ^ >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c: In function ‘bch_flash_dev_request_init’: >> drivers/md/bcache/request.c:1320:18: warning: unused variable ‘g’ [-Wunused-variable] >> 1320 | struct gendisk *g = d->disk; >> | ^ >> >> Did the same here, applied it. > > And just like the previous one I did, and the compiler did not complain. > There must be something about certain gcc versions not warning about > variables that are initialized but not otherwise used. Are you using gcc-10? It sucks for that. gcc-9 seems to reliably hit these cases for me, not sure why gcc-10 doesn't. And the ones quoted above are about as trivial as they can get. -- Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists