Date:   Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:57:12 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] PM, libnvdimm: Add 'mem-quiet' state and callback for firmware activation

On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 3:59:32 AM CEST Dan Williams wrote:
> The runtime firmware activation capability of Intel NVDIMM devices
> requires memory transactions to be disabled for 100s of microseconds.
> This timeout is large enough to cause in-flight DMA to fail and other
> application detectable timeouts. Arrange for firmware activation to be
> executed while the system is "quiesced", all processes and device-DMA
> frozen.
> 
> It is already required that invoking device ->freeze() callbacks is
> sufficient to cease DMA. A device that continues memory writes outside
> of user-direction violates expectations of the PM core to be to
> establish a coherent hibernation image.
> 
> That said, RDMA devices are an example of a device that access memory
> outside of user process direction. RDMA drivers also typically assume
> the system they are operating in will never be hibernated. A solution
> for RDMA collisions with firmware activation is outside the scope of
> this change and may need to rely on being able to survive the platform
> imposed memory controller quiesce period.

Thanks for following my suggestion to use the hibernation infrastructure
rather than the suspend one, but I think it would be better to go a bit
further with that.

Namely, after thinking about this a bit more I have come to the conclusion
that what is needed is an ability to execute a function, inside of the
kernel, in a "quiet" environment in which memory updates are unlikely.

While the hibernation infrastructure as is can be used for that, kind of, IMO
it would be cleaner to introduce a helper for that, like in the (untested)
patch below, so if the "quiet execution environment" is needed, whoever
needs it may simply pass a function to hibernate_quiet_exec() and provide
whatever user-space I/F is suitable on top of that.

Please let me know what you think.

Cheers!

---
 include/linux/suspend.h  |    6 ++
 kernel/power/hibernate.c |   97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 103 insertions(+)

Index: linux-pm/kernel/power/hibernate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/kernel/power/hibernate.c
+++ linux-pm/kernel/power/hibernate.c
@@ -795,6 +795,103 @@ int hibernate(void)
 	return error;
 }
 
+/**
+ * hibernate_quiet_exec - Execute a function with all devices frozen.
+ * @func: Function to execute.
+ * @data: Data pointer to pass to @func.
+ *
+ * Return the @func return value or an error code if it cannot be executed.
+ */
+int hibernate_quiet_exec(int (*func)(void *data), void *data)
+{
+	int error, nr_calls = 0;
+
+	lock_system_sleep();
+
+	if (!hibernate_acquire()) {
+		error = -EBUSY;
+		goto unlock;
+	}
+
+	pm_prepare_console();
+
+	error = __pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE, -1, &nr_calls);
+	if (error) {
+		nr_calls--;
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
+	error = freeze_processes();
+	if (error)
+		goto exit;
+
+	lock_device_hotplug();
+
+	pm_suspend_clear_flags();
+
+	error = platform_begin(true);
+	if (error)
+		goto thaw;
+
+	error = freeze_kernel_threads();
+	if (error)
+		goto thaw;
+
+	error = dpm_prepare(PMSG_FREEZE);
+	if (error)
+		goto dpm_complete;
+
+	suspend_console();
+
+	error = dpm_suspend(PMSG_FREEZE);
+	if (error)
+		goto dpm_resume;
+
+	error = dpm_suspend_end(PMSG_FREEZE);
+	if (error)
+		goto dpm_resume;
+
+	error = platform_pre_snapshot(true);
+	if (error)
+		goto skip;
+
+	error = func(data);
+
+skip:
+	platform_finish(true);
+
+	dpm_resume_start(PMSG_THAW);
+
+dpm_resume:
+	dpm_resume(PMSG_THAW);
+
+	resume_console();
+
+dpm_complete:
+	dpm_complete(PMSG_THAW);
+
+	thaw_kernel_threads();
+
+thaw:
+	platform_end(true);
+
+	unlock_device_hotplug();
+
+	thaw_processes();
+
+exit:
+	__pm_notifier_call_chain(PM_POST_HIBERNATION, nr_calls, NULL);
+
+	pm_restore_console();
+
+	hibernate_release();
+
+unlock:
+	unlock_system_sleep();
+
+	return error;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hibernate_quiet_exec);
 
 /**
  * software_resume - Resume from a saved hibernation image.
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/suspend.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h
@@ -453,6 +453,8 @@ extern bool hibernation_available(void);
 asmlinkage int swsusp_save(void);
 extern struct pbe *restore_pblist;
 int pfn_is_nosave(unsigned long pfn);
+
+int hibernate_quiet_exec(int (*func)(void *data), void *data);
 #else /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */
 static inline void register_nosave_region(unsigned long b, unsigned long e) {}
 static inline void register_nosave_region_late(unsigned long b, unsigned long e) {}
@@ -464,6 +466,10 @@ static inline void hibernation_set_ops(c
 static inline int hibernate(void) { return -ENOSYS; }
 static inline bool system_entering_hibernation(void) { return false; }
 static inline bool hibernation_available(void) { return false; }
+
+static inline hibernate_quiet_exec(int (*func)(void *data), void *data) {
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION_SNAPSHOT_DEV

Powered by blists - more mailing lists