[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7a9319b-37ec-95dd-c20c-76017a3b1699@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:25:23 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@....com>, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, stefanha@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: virtio_scsi: remove unnecessary condition check
On 09/07/20 17:06, Xianting Tian wrote:
> kmem_cache_destroy and mempool_destroy can correctly handle
> null pointer parameter, so there is no need to check if the
> parameter is null before calling kmem_cache_destroy and
> mempool_destroy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@....com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c | 12 ++++--------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> index bfec84a..54ac83e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> @@ -1003,14 +1003,10 @@ static int __init init(void)
> return 0;
>
> error:
> - if (virtscsi_cmd_pool) {
> - mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool);
> - virtscsi_cmd_pool = NULL;
> - }
> - if (virtscsi_cmd_cache) {
> - kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache);
> - virtscsi_cmd_cache = NULL;
> - }
> + mempool_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_pool);
> + virtscsi_cmd_pool = NULL;
> + kmem_cache_destroy(virtscsi_cmd_cache);
> + virtscsi_cmd_cache = NULL;
> return ret;
> }
>
>
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists