[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709153854.GY23821@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 12:38:54 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] PM, libnvdimm: Add 'mem-quiet' state and
callback for firmware activation
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 04:00:51PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 06:59:32PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > The runtime firmware activation capability of Intel NVDIMM devices
> > requires memory transactions to be disabled for 100s of microseconds.
> > This timeout is large enough to cause in-flight DMA to fail and other
> > application detectable timeouts. Arrange for firmware activation to be
> > executed while the system is "quiesced", all processes and device-DMA
> > frozen.
> >
> > It is already required that invoking device ->freeze() callbacks is
> > sufficient to cease DMA. A device that continues memory writes outside
> > of user-direction violates expectations of the PM core to be to
> > establish a coherent hibernation image.
> >
> > That said, RDMA devices are an example of a device that access memory
> > outside of user process direction.
Are you saying freeze doesn't work for some RDMA drivers? That would
be a driver bug, I think.
The consequences of doing freeze are pretty serious, but it should
still stop DMA.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists