[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709161352.GC21059@jcrouse1-lnx.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 10:13:53 -0600
From: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
Cc: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"list@....net:IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Joerg
Roedel <joro@...tes.org>," <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>,
Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@...labora.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Kristian H . Kristensen" <hoegsberg@...gle.com>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 7/7] drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for using system
cache(LLC)
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 09:04:49AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 7:53 AM Sai Prakash Ranjan
> <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > On 2020-07-03 19:07, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 09:22:50PM +0530, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
> > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
> > >> index f455c597f76d..bd1d58229cc2 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_iommu.c
> > >> @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ static int msm_iommu_map(struct msm_mmu *mmu,
> > >> uint64_t iova,
> > >> iova |= GENMASK_ULL(63, 49);
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> + if (mmu->features & MMU_FEATURE_USE_SYSTEM_CACHE)
> > >> + prot |= IOMMU_SYS_CACHE_ONLY;
> > >
> > > Given that I think this is the only user of IOMMU_SYS_CACHE_ONLY, then
> > > it
> > > looks like it should actually be a property on the domain because we
> > > never
> > > need to configure it on a per-mapping basis within a domain, and
> > > therefore
> > > it shouldn't be exposed by the IOMMU API as a prot flag.
> > >
> > > Do you agree?
> > >
> >
> > GPU being the only user is for now, but there are other clients which
> > can use this.
> > Plus how do we set the memory attributes if we do not expose this as
> > prot flag?
>
> It does appear that the downstream kgsl driver sets this for basically
> all mappings.. well there is some conditional stuff around
> DOMAIN_ATTR_USE_LLC_NWA but it seems based on the property of the
> domain. (Jordan may know more about what that is about.) But looks
> like there are a lot of different paths into iommu_map in kgsl so I
> might have missed something.
Downstream does set it universally. There are some theoretical use cases
where it might be beneficial to set it on a per-mapping basis with a bunch
of hinting from userspace and nobody has tried to characterize this on real
hardware so it is not clear to me if it is worth it.
I think a domain wide attribute works for now but if a compelling per-mapping
use case does comes down the pipeline we need to have a backup in mind -
possibly a prot flag to disable NWA?
Jordan
> Assuming there isn't some case where we specifically don't want to use
> the system cache for some mapping, I think it could be a domain
> attribute that sets an io_pgtable_cfg::quirks flag
>
> BR,
> -R
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists