[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200709164845.GB6579@gaia>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 17:48:46 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2@...wei.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mark.rutland@....com, will@...nel.org,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
npiggin@...il.com, arnd@...db.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
maz@...nel.org, suzuki.poulose@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
yuzhao@...gle.com, Dave.Martin@....com, steven.price@....com,
broonie@...nel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, arm@...nel.org,
xiexiangyou@...wei.com, prime.zeng@...ilicon.com,
zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com, kuhn.chenqun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: Add tlbi_user_level TLB
invalidation helper
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 04:03:11PM +0800, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
> @@ -189,8 +195,9 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr = __TLBI_VADDR(uaddr, ASID(vma->vm_mm));
>
> dsb(ishst);
> - __tlbi(vale1is, addr);
> - __tlbi_user(vale1is, addr);
> + /* This function is only called on a small page */
> + __tlbi_level(vale1is, addr, 3);
> + __tlbi_user_level(vale1is, addr, 3);
> }
Actually, that's incorrect. It was ok in v2 of your patches when I
suggested to drop level 0, just leave the function unchanged but I
missed that you updated it to pass level 3.
pmdp_set_access_flags -> ptep_set_access_flags ->
flush_tlb_fix_spurious_fault -> flush_tlb_page -> flush_tlb_page_nosync.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists