lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:53:38 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: x86: move MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES emulation to
 common x86 code

On 10/07/20 17:25, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> state_test/smm_test selftests are failing on AMD with:
> "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSRS, r: 51 (failed MSR was 0x345)"
> 
> MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES is an emulated MSR on Intel but it is not
> known to AMD code, we can move the emulation to common x86 code. For
> AMD, we basically just allow the host to read and write zero to the MSR.
> 
> Fixes: 27461da31089 ("KVM: x86/pmu: Support full width counting")
> Suggested-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> ---
> - This is a succesor of "[PATCH v2] KVM: SVM: emulate MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES".
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c       |  2 ++
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 17 -----------------
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c           | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index c0da4dd78ac5..1b68cc6cd756 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -2358,6 +2358,8 @@ static int svm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
>  		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC))
>  			msr->data |= MSR_F10H_DECFG_LFENCE_SERIALIZE;
>  		break;
> +	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
> +		return 0;
>  	default:
>  		return 1;
>  	}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> index bdcce65c7a1d..a886a47daebd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
> @@ -180,9 +180,6 @@ static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
>  	case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
>  		ret = pmu->version > 1;
>  		break;
> -	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
> -		ret = 1;
> -		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0) ||
>  			get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_P6_EVNTSEL0) ||
> @@ -224,12 +221,6 @@ static int intel_pmu_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  	case MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL:
>  		msr_info->data = pmu->global_ovf_ctrl;
>  		return 0;
> -	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
> -		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> -		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
> -			return 1;
> -		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities;
> -		return 0;
>  	default:
>  		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>  		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
> @@ -289,14 +280,6 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  			return 0;
>  		}
>  		break;
> -	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
> -		if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
> -			return 1;
> -		if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PDCM) ?
> -			(data & ~vmx_get_perf_capabilities()) : data)
> -			return 1;
> -		vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities = data;
> -		return 0;
>  	default:
>  		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0)) ||
>  		    (pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0))) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 3b92db412335..a08bd66cd662 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2817,6 +2817,20 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  			return 1;
>  		vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities = data;
>  		break;
> +	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES: {
> +		struct kvm_msr_entry msr_ent = {.index = msr, .data = 0};
> +
> +		if (!msr_info->host_initiated)
> +			return 1;
> +		if (guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PDCM) && kvm_get_msr_feature(&msr_ent))
> +			return 1;
> +		if (data & ~msr_ent.data)
> +			return 1;
> +
> +		vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities = data;
> +
> +		return 0;
> +		}
>  	case MSR_EFER:
>  		return set_efer(vcpu, msr_info);
>  	case MSR_K7_HWCR:
> @@ -3167,6 +3181,12 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  			return 1;
>  		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities;
>  		break;
> +	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
> +		if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
> +		    !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_PDCM))
> +			return 1;
> +		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities;
> +		break;
>  	case MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL:
>  		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_power_ctl;
>  		break;
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ