linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] genpd: Fix up terminology with parent/child

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <db753175946cf53e77999d1fbb3cf949f777ef61.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:13:51 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] genpd: Fix up terminology with parent/child

On Wed, 2020-07-08 at 16:32 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The genpd infrastructure uses the terms master/slave, but such uses have
> no external exposures (not even in Documentation/driver-api/pm/*) and are
> not mandated by nor associated with any external specifications. Change
> the language used through-out to parent/child.

Thanks.

Perhaps change a couple more references:

$ grep -i -P '(?:master|slave)' drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
	/* Link genpd masters/subdomains to model the CPU topology. */
$ grep -i -P '(?:master|slave)' drivers/opp/core.c
	 * genpd and its master have one to one mapping of performance states