linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: XDP: restrict N: and K:

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <458f6e74-b547-299a-4255-4c1e20cdba1b@al2klimov.de>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:18:12 +0200
From:   "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, ast@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, hawk@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, mchehab+huawei@...nel.org,
        robh@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: XDP: restrict N: and K:



Am 10.07.20 um 18:12 schrieb Toke Høiland-Jørgensen:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
> 
>> On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 17:14 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>> On 7/10/20 8:17 AM, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
>>>> Am 09.07.20 um 22:37 schrieb Daniel Borkmann:
>>>>> On 7/9/20 9:42 PM, Alexander A. Klimov wrote:
>>>>>> Rationale:
>>>>>> Documentation/arm/ixp4xx.rst contains "xdp" as part of "ixdp465"
>>>>>> which has nothing to do with XDP.
>> []
>>>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> []
>>>>>> @@ -18708,8 +18708,8 @@ F:    include/trace/events/xdp.h
>>>>>>    F:    kernel/bpf/cpumap.c
>>>>>>    F:    kernel/bpf/devmap.c
>>>>>>    F:    net/core/xdp.c
>>>>>> -N:    xdp
>>>>>> -K:    xdp
>>>>>> +N:    (?:\b|_)xdp(?:\b|_)
>>>>>> +K:    (?:\b|_)xdp(?:\b|_)
>>>>>
>>>>> Please also include \W to generally match on non-alphanumeric char given you
>>>>> explicitly want to avoid [a-z0-9] around the term xdp.
>>>> Aren't \W, ^ and $ already covered by \b?
>>>
>>> Ah, true; it says '\b really means (?:(?<=\w)(?!\w)|(?<!\w)(?=\w))', so all good.
>>> In case this goes via net or net-next tree:
>>
>> This N: pattern does not match files like:
>>
>> 	samples/bpf/xdp1_kern.c
>>
>> and does match files like:
>>
>> 	drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c
>>
>> Should it?
> 
> I think the idea is that it should match both?
In *your* opinion: Which of these shall it (not) match?

> 
> -Toke
>