[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200710185156.2437687-3-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 11:51:56 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH for-next/seccomp 2/2] selftests/seccomp: Set NNP for TSYNC ESRCH flag test
The TSYNC ESRCH flag test will fail for regular users because NNP was
not set yet. Add NNP setting.
Fixes: 51891498f2da ("seccomp: allow TSYNC and USER_NOTIF together")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
index 08bfbb7fc1c2..93de2f1e3a99 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c
@@ -3238,6 +3238,11 @@ TEST(user_notification_with_tsync)
int ret;
unsigned int flags;
+ ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, ret) {
+ TH_LOG("Kernel does not support PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS!");
+ }
+
/* these were exclusive */
flags = SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_NEW_LISTENER |
SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists