[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMzpN2i3TPxpf5ktaQgb5EmB9wd84V+J5U6=_MuihtXx1-cp+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 00:38:23 -0400
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] x86/percpu: Clean up percpu_to_op()
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:30 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 06:11:19PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> > + if (0) { \
> > + typeof(_var) pto_tmp__; \
> > + pto_tmp__ = (_val); \
> > + (void)pto_tmp__; \
> > + } \
>
> This is repeated at least once more; and it looks very similar to
> __typecheck() and typecheck() but is yet another variant afaict.
The problem with typecheck() is that it will complain about a mismatch
between unsigned long and u64 (defined as unsigned long long) even
though both are 64-bits wide on x86-64. Cleaning that mess up is
beyond the scope of this series, so I kept the existing checks.
--
Brian Gerst
Powered by blists - more mailing lists