linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/vmalloc.c: Add an error message if two areas overlap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200710200418.GA19627@pc636>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:04:18 +0200
From:   Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/vmalloc.c: Add an error message if two areas
 overlap

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:01:38PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 10:00:30PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 08:44:06PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:40:42PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > > > Before triggering a BUG() it would be useful to understand
> > > > how two areas overlap between each other. Print information
> > > > about start/end addresses of both VAs and their addresses.
> > > > 
> > > > For example if both are identical it could mean double free.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  mm/vmalloc.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > index 5a2b55c8dd9a..1679b01febcd 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> > > > @@ -549,8 +549,13 @@ find_va_links(struct vmap_area *va,
> > > >  		else if (va->va_end > tmp_va->va_start &&
> > > >  				va->va_start >= tmp_va->va_end)
> > > >  			link = &(*link)->rb_right;
> > > > -		else
> > > > +		else {
> > > > +			pr_err("Overlaps: 0x%px(0x%lx-0x%lx), 0x%px(0x%lx-0x%lx)\n",
> > > > +				va, va->va_start, va->va_end, tmp_va,
> > > > +				tmp_va->va_start, tmp_va->va_end);
> > > 
> > > It might be helpful to have a "vmalloc:" prefix to that string to indicate
> > > where to start searching.  And I don't think we're supposed to use %px
> > > without a really good justification these days.
> > >
> > That makes sense, i will add such prefix for sure. As for %px i can just
> > use a casting to (unsigned long) and 0x%lx prefix.
> 
> That's not the point.  Linus wants us to not display actual pointers to
> the user.
> 
Ahh, Got it!

Then i will just remove information about addresses of two VAs.
Hope that will work.

--
Vlad Rezki