lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:31:55 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
        bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
        ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/17] x86/static_call: Add inline static call
 implementation for x86-64

On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:38:41 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/hashtable.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/static_call_types.h>
>  
>  #define FAKE_JUMP_OFFSET -1
>  
> @@ -433,6 +434,99 @@ static int add_dead_ends(struct objtool_
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int create_static_call_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
> +{
> +	struct section *sec, *reloc_sec;
> +	struct reloc *reloc;
> +	struct static_call_site *site;
> +	struct instruction *insn;
> +	struct symbol *key_sym;
> +	char *key_name, *tmp;
> +	int idx;
> +
> +	sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".static_call_sites");
> +	if (sec) {
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&file->static_call_list);
> +		WARN("file already has .static_call_sites section, skipping");
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&file->static_call_list))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	idx = 0;
> +	list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->static_call_list, static_call_node)
> +		idx++;
> +
> +	sec = elf_create_section(file->elf, ".static_call_sites", SHF_WRITE,
> +				 sizeof(struct static_call_site), idx);
> +	if (!sec)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	reloc_sec = elf_create_reloc_section(file->elf, sec, SHT_RELA);
> +	if (!reloc_sec)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	idx = 0;
> +	list_for_each_entry(insn, &file->static_call_list, static_call_node) {
> +
> +		site = (struct static_call_site *)sec->data->d_buf + idx;
> +		memset(site, 0, sizeof(struct static_call_site));
> +
> +		/* populate reloc for 'addr' */
> +		reloc = malloc(sizeof(*reloc));
> +		if (!reloc) {
> +			perror("malloc");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		memset(reloc, 0, sizeof(*reloc));
> +		reloc->sym = insn->sec->sym;
> +		reloc->addend = insn->offset;
> +		reloc->type = R_X86_64_PC32;
> +		reloc->offset = idx * sizeof(struct static_call_site);
> +		reloc->sec = reloc_sec;
> +		elf_add_reloc(file->elf, reloc);
> +
> +		/* find key symbol */
> +		key_name = strdup(insn->call_dest->name);

Should check for failed allocation of strdup().

> +		if (strncmp(key_name, STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_PREFIX_STR,
> +			    strlen(STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_PREFIX_STR))) {
> +			WARN("static_call: trampoline name malformed: %s", key_name);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		tmp = key_name + STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_PREFIX_LEN - STATIC_CALL_KEY_PREFIX_LEN;
> +		memcpy(tmp, STATIC_CALL_KEY_PREFIX_STR, STATIC_CALL_KEY_PREFIX_LEN);
> +
> +		key_sym = find_symbol_by_name(file->elf, tmp);
> +		if (!key_sym) {
> +			WARN("static_call: can't find static_call_key symbol: %s", tmp);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		free(key_name);
> +
> +		/* populate reloc for 'key' */
> +		reloc = malloc(sizeof(*reloc));
> +		if (!reloc) {
> +			perror("malloc");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		memset(reloc, 0, sizeof(*reloc));
> +		reloc->sym = key_sym;
> +		reloc->addend = 0;
> +		reloc->type = R_X86_64_PC32;

How easy would this be for other architectures to implement this? That
is how much of this function is x86 specific?


-- Steve

> +		reloc->offset = idx * sizeof(struct static_call_site) + 4;
> +		reloc->sec = reloc_sec;
> +		elf_add_reloc(file->elf, reloc);
> +
> +		idx++;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (elf_rebuild_reloc_section(file->elf, reloc_sec))
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ