[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200710184434.26a5c868@oasis.local.home>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 18:44:34 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
bristot@...hat.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com, hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/17] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to
emulate RET
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:38:43 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Future patches will need to poke a RET instruction, provide the
> infrastructure required for this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Much easier than emulating a CALL :-)
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists