lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39c76c43-cd5f-40cb-7225-e2e143f8c131@web.de>
Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:11:00 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@....com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "James E. J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: scsi: virtio_scsi: Remove unnecessary condition checks

>> Can a bit more “compliance” (with the Linux coding style) matter here?
>
> No.

Please take another look at the corresponding software documentation.


>>> Having a single error loop is an advantage by itself.
>>
>> I do not see that a loop is involved in the implementation of the function “init”.
>
> s/loop/label/ sorry.

Thanks for this information.

Can the development attention grow for corresponding implementation details
around the specifcation of efficient exception handling?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=42f82040ee66db13525dc6f14b8559890b2f4c1c#n465

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ