[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39c76c43-cd5f-40cb-7225-e2e143f8c131@web.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:11:00 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@....com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"James E. J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: scsi: virtio_scsi: Remove unnecessary condition checks
>> Can a bit more “compliance” (with the Linux coding style) matter here?
>
> No.
Please take another look at the corresponding software documentation.
>>> Having a single error loop is an advantage by itself.
>>
>> I do not see that a loop is involved in the implementation of the function “init”.
>
> s/loop/label/ sorry.
Thanks for this information.
Can the development attention grow for corresponding implementation details
around the specifcation of efficient exception handling?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=42f82040ee66db13525dc6f14b8559890b2f4c1c#n465
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists