[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a676fc18-6f1f-8502-e8d5-5ad1ccf0eec6@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:34:45 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: willy.mh.wolff.ml@...il.com, k.konieczny@...sung.com,
b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, krzk@...nel.org, chanwoo@...nel.org,
myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Adjust polling
interval and uptreshold
Hi Chanwoo,
On 7/9/20 5:08 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
>
> On 7/9/20 12:34 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> In order to react faster and make better decisions under some workloads,
>> benchmarking the memory subsystem behavior, adjust the polling interval
>> and upthreshold value used by the simple_ondemand governor.
>>
>> Reported-by: Willy Wolff <willy.mh.wolff.ml@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
>> index 93e9c2429c0d..e03ee35f0ab5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
>> @@ -1466,10 +1466,10 @@ static int exynos5_dmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> * Setup default thresholds for the devfreq governor.
>> * The values are chosen based on experiments.
>> */
>> - dmc->gov_data.upthreshold = 30;
>> + dmc->gov_data.upthreshold = 10;
>> dmc->gov_data.downdifferential = 5;
>>
>> - exynos5_dmc_df_profile.polling_ms = 500;
>> + exynos5_dmc_df_profile.polling_ms = 100;
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
>
Thank you for the review. Do you think this patch could go through
your tree together with your patches?
I don't know Krzysztof's opinion about the patch 2/2, but
I would expect, assuming the patch itself is correct, he would
like to take it into his next/dt branch.
Regards,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists