[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eeeae7d9-c028-47f0-ab5b-7983e32f36cb@EXC03-ATKLA.omicron.at>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:59:00 +0000
From: Thomas Graziadei <thomas.graziadei@...cronenergy.com>
To: "'Sebastian Andrzej Siewior'" <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Mark Marshall <markmarshall14@...il.com>
CC: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Marshall <mark.marshall@...cronenergy.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: RE: Kernel crash due to memory corruption with v5.4.26-rt17 and
PowerPC e500
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for looking into this.
We could reproduce the issue with QEMU.
At runtime you need to set mdev as the kernel's hotplug client (/proc/sys/kernel/hotplug) and give it a dummy /etc/mdev.conf like (.* 1:1 777). Then just do a loop and insmod/rmmod crc4.ko and crc7.ko.
Swapping the mm assignment did not work -> exception after 1900 iterations
Your second suggestion with check.patch (attached to this email for completeness, only protecting the exec_mmap function) did not work eighter -> exception after 2600 iterations
Your third suggestion (a modification to the original revert) enclosed in this e-mail does seem to work. Still no problems after 30000 iterations.
By the way, as noticed in your kernel config, we would be quite interested in a gcc 9 compiler for our platform. Is there a mainline/maintained version or fork for this or another possibility to get it?
Regards,
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [mailto:bigeasy@...utronix.de]
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2020 6:50 PM
To: Mark Marshall <markmarshall14@...il.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>; Mark Marshall <mark.marshall@...cronenergy.com>; Thomas Graziadei <thomas.graziadei@...cronenergy.com>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: Kernel crash due to memory corruption with v5.4.26-rt17 and PowerPC e500
On 2020-05-29 18:37:22 [+0200], To Mark Marshall wrote:
> On 2020-05-29 18:15:18 [+0200], To Mark Marshall wrote:
> > In order to get it back into the RT queue I need to understand why
> > it is required. What exactly is it fixing. Let me stare at for a
> > littleā¦
>
> it used to be local_irq_disable() which then became preempt_disable()
> local_irq_disable() due to ARM's limitation.
Any luck on your side?
I *think* if you swap the mm assignment in exec_mmap() then it should be gone. Basically:
| tsk->active_mm = mm;
| tsk->mm = mm;
However I think to apply something like this:
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1035,11 +1035,15 @@ static int exec_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
}
}
task_lock(tsk);
+
+ task_lock_mm();
active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
membarrier_exec_mmap(mm);
tsk->mm = mm;
tsk->active_mm = mm;
activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
+ task_unlock_mm();
+
tsk->mm->vmacache_seqnum = 0;
vmacache_flush(tsk);
task_unlock(tsk);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/task.h b/include/linux/sched/task.h
--- a/include/linux/sched/task.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/task.h
@@ -176,4 +176,31 @@ static inline void task_unlock(struct task_struct *p)
spin_unlock(&p->alloc_lock);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+/*
+ * Protects ->mm and ->active_mm.
+ * Avoids scheduling so switch_mm() or enter_lazy_tlb() will not read
+the
+ * members while they are updated.
+ */
+static inline void task_lock_mm(void)
+{
+ preempt_disable();
+}
+
+static inline void task_unlock_mm(void) {
+ preempt_enable();
+}
+
+#else
+
+static inline void task_lock_mm(void)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void task_unlock_mm(void) { } #endif
+
#endif /* _LINUX_SCHED_TASK_H */
diff --git a/mm/mmu_context.c b/mm/mmu_context.c
--- a/mm/mmu_context.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_context.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
task_lock(tsk);
+ task_lock_mm();
active_mm = tsk->active_mm;
if (active_mm != mm) {
mmgrab(mm);
@@ -32,6 +33,7 @@ void use_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
}
tsk->mm = mm;
switch_mm(active_mm, mm, tsk);
+ task_unlock_mm();
task_unlock(tsk);
#ifdef finish_arch_post_lock_switch
finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
@@ -55,10 +57,12 @@ void unuse_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
task_lock(tsk);
+ task_lock_mm();
sync_mm_rss(mm);
tsk->mm = NULL;
/* active_mm is still 'mm' */
enter_lazy_tlb(mm, tsk);
+ task_unlock_mm();
task_unlock(tsk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unuse_mm);
--
2.27.0
> > > Best regards,
> > > Mark
Sebastian
Download attachment "check.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (437 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists