[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200710152658.31a9391a@carbon>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:26:58 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: generic DMA bypass flag v4
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 17:24:44 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> Note that as-is this breaks the XSK buffer pool, which unfortunately
> poked directly into DMA internals. A fix for that is already queued
> up in the netdev tree.
>
> Jesper and XDP gang: this should not regress any performance as
> the dma-direct calls are now inlined into the out of line DMA mapping
> calls. But if you can verify the performance numbers that would be
> greatly appreciated.
From a superficial review of the patches, they look okay to me. I don't
have time to run a performance benchmark (before I go on vacation).
I hoped Björn could test/benchmark this(?), given (as mentioned) this
also affect XSK / AF_XDP performance.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists