[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANaguZArdu1Jz3SvogFSXhnqmbdKX5aAORmGMf_uc+J=UQZpJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:36:42 -0400
From: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>
To: "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Subhra Mazumdar <subhra.mazumdar@...cle.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kerr <kerrnel@...gle.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <vineethrp@...il.com>,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/16] irq: Add support for core-wide protection of
IRQ and softirq
Hi Aubrey,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 8:19 AM Li, Aubrey <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Joel/Vineeth,
> [...]
> The problem is gone when we reverted this patch. We are running multiple
> uperf threads(equal to cpu number) in a cgroup with coresched enabled.
> This is 100% reproducible on our side.
>
> Just wonder if anything already known before we dig into it.
>
Thanks for reporting this. We haven't seen any lockups like this
in our testing yet.
Could you please add more information on how to reproduce this?
Was it a simple uperf run without any options or was it running any
specific kind of network test?
We shall also try to reproduce this and investigate.
Thanks,
Vineeth
Powered by blists - more mailing lists