[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200710133831.943894387@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:38:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mhiramat@...nel.org, bristot@...hat.com,
jbaron@...mai.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, namit@...are.com,
hpa@...or.com, luto@...nel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/17] Add static_call
Hi all,
Hopefully for the last time...
static_call(), is the idea of static_branch() applied to indirect function
calls. Remove a data load (indirection) by modifying the text.
The inline implementation still relies on objtool to generate the
.static_call_sites section, mostly because this is a natural place for x86_64
and works for both GCC and LLVM. Other architectures can pick other means
if/when they implement the inline patching. The out-of-line (aka. trampoline)
variant doesn't require this.
Patches go on top of: linus + tip/objtool/core
Patches can also be found here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git x86/static_call
Changes since the last time:
- rebased
- fixed ftrace synthetic events (rostedt)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists