[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200710134932.GA16257@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 14:49:32 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kanchan Joshi <joshiiitr@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@...sung.com>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
bcrl@...ck.org, Damien.LeMoal@....com, asml.silence@...il.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Matias Bj??rling <mb@...htnvm.io>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Selvakumar S <selvakuma.s1@...sung.com>,
Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] io_uring: add support for zone-append
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:48:24PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> If we're going to go the route of changing the CQE, how about:
>
> struct io_uring_cqe {
> __u64 user_data; /* sqe->data submission passed back */
> - __s32 res; /* result code for this event */
> - __u32 flags;
> + union {
> + struct {
> + __s32 res; /* result code for this event */
> + __u32 flags;
> + };
> + __s64 res64;
> + };
> };
>
> then we don't need to change the CQE size and it just depends on the SQE
> whether the CQE for it uses res+flags or res64.
How do you return a status code or short write when you just have
a u64 that is needed for the offset?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists