[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200710225017.5ce329485e911f99e17cd483@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 22:50:17 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: guoren@...nel.org
Cc: palmerdabbelt@...gle.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
anup@...infault.org, greentime.hu@...ive.com, zong.li@...ive.com,
me@...ki.ch, bjorn.topel@...il.com, atish.patra@....com,
penberg@...nel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] riscv: Add KPROBES_ON_FTRACE supported
Hi Guo,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 02:19:14 +0000
guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> +/* Ftrace callback handler for kprobes -- called under preepmt disabed */
> +void kprobe_ftrace_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> + struct ftrace_ops *ops, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + struct kprobe *p;
> + struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb;
> +
> + p = get_kprobe((kprobe_opcode_t *)ip);
> + if (unlikely(!p) || kprobe_disabled(p))
> + return;
> +
> + kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> + if (kprobe_running()) {
> + kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * The regs->epc hasn't been saved by SAVE_ALL in mcount-dyn.S
> + * So no need to resume it, just for kprobe handler.
> + */
> + instruction_pointer_set(regs, ip);
> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, p);
> + kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
> + if (!p->pre_handler || !p->pre_handler(p, regs)) {
> + /*
> + * Emulate singlestep (and also recover regs->pc)
> + * as if there is a nop
> + */
> + instruction_pointer_set(regs,
> + (unsigned long)p->addr + MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> + if (unlikely(p->post_handler)) {
> + kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SSDONE;
> + p->post_handler(p, regs, 0);
> + }
Hmm, don't you need restoring the previous instruction pointer here?
If you don't support modifying the instruction pointer in the handler,
it must not be compatible with kprobes.
Now BPF function override and function error injection depends on
this behevior, so could you consider to support it in the "ftrace"
implementation at first? (And if it is enabled, you can enable the
livepatch on RISCV too)
Thank you,
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If pre_handler returns !0, it changes regs->pc. We have to
> + * skip emulating post_handler.
> + */
> + __this_cpu_write(current_kprobe, NULL);
> + }
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_ftrace_handler);
> +
> +int arch_prepare_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p)
> +{
> + p->ainsn.api.insn = NULL;
> + return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists