linux-kernel - Re: [selftests] 7cb32086e5: kernel-selftests.x86.check_initial_reg_state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 08:18:49 -0600
From:   Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@...hat.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [selftests] 7cb32086e5:
 kernel-selftests.x86.check_initial_reg_state_32.fail

On 7/10/20 12:02 AM, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 6:36 PM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/9/20 12:49 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
>>> Greeting,
>>>
>>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-9):
>>>
>>> commit: 7cb32086e59b514a832a3e11f5370d37e7cfe022 ("selftests: simplify run_tests")
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the report. I will drop this patch for now from next.
>>
>> Yauheni,
>>
>> This patch broke x86 32-bit test run
>> make run_tests -C x86
>>
>> Please resubmit the patch with the fix.
> 
> I did not check carefully the report, but isn't it expected that some
> tests are moved after the patch since they originally were placed
> incorrectly?
> 
> 
The failure doesn't have anything to do with test being moved. You can
reproduce this very easily by running make as shown below in x86 dir
under tools/testing/selftests

make run_tests -C x86

I reproduced the problem with your and patch and verified that the
problem tracks your patch. I dropped the patch from linux-next
Your other two patches in the series are fine.

In any case, this patch isn't really adding any functionality and
is a good cleanup. Let's do the cleanup right or not.

thanks,
-- Shuah