| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 15:22:32 +0100
From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andriin@...com
Cc: kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: use dedicated bpf_trace_printk event instead of trace_printk()
The bpf helper bpf_trace_printk() uses trace_printk() under the hood.
This leads to an alarming warning message originating from trace
buffer allocation which occurs the first time a program using
bpf_trace_printk() is loaded.
We can instead create a trace event for bpf_trace_printk() and enable
it in-kernel when/if we encounter a program using the
bpf_trace_printk() helper. With this approach, trace_printk()
is not used directly and no warning message appears.
This work was started by Steven (see Link) and finished by Alan; added
Steven's Signed-off-by with his permission.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200628194334.6238b933@oasis.local.home
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
---
kernel/trace/Makefile | 2 ++
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
diff --git a/kernel/trace/Makefile b/kernel/trace/Makefile
index 6575bb0..aeba5ee 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/trace/Makefile
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_GCOV_PROFILE_FTRACE
GCOV_PROFILE := y
endif
+CFLAGS_bpf_trace.o := -I$(src)
+
CFLAGS_trace_benchmark.o := -I$(src)
CFLAGS_trace_events_filter.o := -I$(src)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 1d874d8..1414bf5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/error-injection.h>
@@ -19,6 +20,9 @@
#include "trace_probe.h"
#include "trace.h"
+#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
+#include "bpf_trace.h"
+
#define bpf_event_rcu_dereference(p) \
rcu_dereference_protected(p, lockdep_is_held(&bpf_event_mutex))
@@ -374,6 +378,29 @@ static void bpf_trace_copy_string(char *buf, void *unsafe_ptr, char fmt_ptype,
}
}
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(trace_printk_lock);
+
+#define BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE 1024
+
+
+static inline __printf(1, 0) int bpf_do_trace_printk(const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+ static char buf[BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE];
+ unsigned long flags;
+ va_list ap;
+ int ret;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&trace_printk_lock, flags);
+ va_start(ap, fmt);
+ ret = vsnprintf(buf, BPF_TRACE_PRINTK_SIZE, fmt, ap);
+ va_end(ap);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ trace_bpf_trace_printk(buf);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&trace_printk_lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/*
* Only limited trace_printk() conversion specifiers allowed:
* %d %i %u %x %ld %li %lu %lx %lld %lli %llu %llx %p %pB %pks %pus %s
@@ -483,8 +510,7 @@ static void bpf_trace_copy_string(char *buf, void *unsafe_ptr, char fmt_ptype,
*/
#define __BPF_TP_EMIT() __BPF_ARG3_TP()
#define __BPF_TP(...) \
- __trace_printk(0 /* Fake ip */, \
- fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+ bpf_do_trace_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define __BPF_ARG1_TP(...) \
((mod[0] == 2 || (mod[0] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) \
@@ -521,10 +547,15 @@ static void bpf_trace_copy_string(char *buf, void *unsafe_ptr, char fmt_ptype,
const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_get_trace_printk_proto(void)
{
/*
- * this program might be calling bpf_trace_printk,
- * so allocate per-cpu printk buffers
+ * This program might be calling bpf_trace_printk,
+ * so enable the associated bpf_trace/bpf_trace_printk event.
+ * Repeat this each time as it is possible a user has
+ * disabled bpf_trace_printk events. By loading a program
+ * calling bpf_trace_printk() however the user has expressed
+ * the intent to see such events.
*/
- trace_printk_init_buffers();
+ if (trace_set_clr_event("bpf_trace", "bpf_trace_printk", 1))
+ pr_warn_ratelimited("could not enable bpf_trace_printk events");
return &bpf_trace_printk_proto;
}
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9acbc11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.h
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM bpf_trace
+
+#if !defined(_TRACE_BPF_TRACE_H) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+
+#define _TRACE_BPF_TRACE_H
+
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+
+TRACE_EVENT(bpf_trace_printk,
+
+ TP_PROTO(const char *bpf_string),
+
+ TP_ARGS(bpf_string),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __string(bpf_string, bpf_string)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ __assign_str(bpf_string, bpf_string);
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("%s", __get_str(bpf_string))
+);
+
+#endif /* _TRACE_BPF_TRACE_H */
+
+#undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
+#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
+#define TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE bpf_trace
+
+#include <trace/define_trace.h>
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists