linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Adjust polling interval and uptreshold

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 10 Jul 2020 16:49:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, willy.mh.wolff.ml@...il.com,
        k.konieczny@...sung.com, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
        chanwoo@...nel.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
        kyungmin.park@...sung.com, s.nawrocki@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Adjust polling
 interval and uptreshold

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 02:41:28PM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/10/20 2:19 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:13:18PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
 > In such case, maybe as you said, let's switch to polling mode
> > unconditionally?
> 
> I can make happen that the polling mode will be unconditionally
> set as default.
> 
> Do you think that the interrupt mode code can still stay in the
> driver, because maybe in future could be fixed?

How interrupt mode would exist in such case? Or rather: how would it be
used? There is no point to keep dead code and code once removed, can be
easily brought back.

Best regards,
Krzysztof