[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02f2c538-c192-65d3-75ec-7874436b966c@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 14:45:16 -0700
From: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ashok.raj@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC negotiation result if
pcie_ports_native is set.
Hi Bjorn,
On 7/9/20 4:07 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:32:33AM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>>
>> pcie_ports_native is set only if user requests native handling
>> of PCIe capabilities via pcie_port_setup command line option.
>> User input takes precedence over _OSC based control negotiation
>> result. So consider the _OSC negotiated result only if
>> pcie_ports_native is unset.
>>
>> Also, since struct pci_host_bridge ->native_* members caches the
>> ownership status of various PCIe capabilities, use them instead
>> of distributed checks for pcie_ports_native.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
>> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 3 ---
>> drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 9 +++------
>> drivers/pci/probe.c | 5 +++--
>> 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> index f90e841c59f5..02fab8b0118e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
>> @@ -914,18 +914,20 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>> goto out_release_info;
>>
>> host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge);
>> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
>> - host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
>> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
>> - host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
>> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
>> - host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
>> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
>> - host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
>> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
>> - host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
>> - if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL))
>> - host_bridge->native_dpc = 0;
>> + if (!pcie_ports_native) {
>> + if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
>> + host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
>> + if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
>> + host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
>> + if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
>> + host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
>> + if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
>> + host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
>> + if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
>> + host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
>> + if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL))
>> + host_bridge->native_dpc = 0;
>> + }
>
> When the user boots with "pcie_ports=native", should we evaluate _OSC
> at all?
Since pcie_ports="native" does not override
OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL, I think we should still evaluate _OSC.
Also firmware might still wants to know about supported features during
_OSC call.
It seems confusing to say "OK, Mr. Firmware, here are the
> features we want to use", and then turn around and use them all
> regardless of what the platform said. Why not just ignore the
> firmware completely and go ahead and use everything?|
AFAIK, for PCIe features, It should functionally make no difference
(evaluating _OSC vs not). But, IMO, its useful if we print some warnings
if firmware denies some of the PCIe feature control.
>
> I can't remember if there's a reason we need to call
> negotiate_os_control() so early and then hang on to the results until
> we get here:
>
> acpi_pci_root_add
> negotiate_os_control <--- eval _OSC
> pci_acpi_scan_root
> acpi_pci_root_create
> pci_create_root_bus
> if (!(root->osc_control_set & ...)) <--- use results
> host_bridge->native_... = 0;
>
> I think it would be a lot simpler if we could do the _OSC negotiation
> right here where we need most of the results. It would be even better
> if we could update the host_bridge->native_... items directly inside
> negotiate_os_control() so we wouldn't have to hang onto the
> osc_control_set mask.
Makes sense. I also don't see any one use _OSC negotiated results until
pci_create_root_bus(). But I think this should be a seperate patch.
>
>> /*
>> * Evaluate the "PCI Boot Configuration" _DSM Function. If it
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
>> index bf779f291f15..5fc999bf6f1b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c
>> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static bool pme_is_native(struct pcie_device *dev)
>> const struct pci_host_bridge *host;
>>
>> host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->port->bus);
>> - return pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme;
>> + return host->native_pme;
>> }
>>
>> static void pciehp_disable_interrupt(struct pcie_device *dev)
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> index 7224b1e5f2a8..e09589571a9d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>> @@ -800,9 +800,6 @@ bool pciehp_is_native(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>> if (!(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPC))
>> return false;
>>
>> - if (pcie_ports_native)
>> - return true;
>> -
>> host = pci_find_host_bridge(bridge->bus);
>> return host->native_pcie_hotplug;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> index 3acf56683915..d663bd9c7257 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
>> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> if (!dev->aer_cap)
>> return 0;
>>
>> - return pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer;
>> + return host->native_aer;
>> }
>>
>> int pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> index 50a9522ab07d..ccd5e0ce5605 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c
>> @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);
>> int services = 0;
>>
>> - if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge &&
>> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pcie_hotplug)) {
>> + if (dev->is_hotplug_bridge && host->native_pcie_hotplug) {
>> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_HP;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -221,8 +220,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
>> - if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() &&
>> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer)) {
>> + if (dev->aer_cap && pci_aer_available() && host->native_aer) {
>> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_AER;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -238,8 +236,7 @@ static int get_port_device_capability(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> * Event Collectors can also generate PMEs, but we don't handle
>> * those yet.
>> */
>> - if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
>> - (pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme)) {
>> + if (pci_pcie_type(dev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT && host->native_pme) {
>> services |= PCIE_PORT_SERVICE_PME;
>
> I *love* that you removed pcie_ports_native from all these places.
>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index 2f66988cea25..5fb90bb9b4e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -588,13 +588,14 @@ static void pci_init_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
>> * may implement its own AER handling and use _OSC to prevent the
>> * OS from interfering.
>> */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS
>> bridge->native_aer = 1;
>> bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 1;
>> - bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 1;
>> bridge->native_pme = 1;
>> bridge->native_ltr = 1;
>> bridge->native_dpc = 1;
>> -
>> +#endif
>> + bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 1;
>
> This looks like a bugfix that should be its own patch.
Agreed. I will split it in next version.
>
>> device_initialize(&bridge->dev);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists