linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] scsi: ufs: Quiesce all scsi devices before shutdown

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1594517468.10600.35.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date:   Sun, 12 Jul 2020 09:31:08 +0800
From:   Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To:     <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <bvanassche@....org>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>,
        <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, <chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com>,
        <andy.teng@...iatek.com>, <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
        <cc.chou@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] scsi: ufs: Quiesce all scsi devices before
 shutdown

Hi Bart, Avri,

May I know if you have any suggestion for this RFC fix?

Very appreciated : )

On Mon, 2020-07-06 at 21:22 +0800, Stanley Chu wrote:
> Currently I/O request could be still submitted to UFS device while
> UFS is working on shutdown flow. This may lead to racing as below
> scenarios and finally system may crash due to unclocked register
> accesses.
> 
> To fix this kind of issues, specifically quiesce all SCSI devices
> before UFS shutdown to block all I/O request sending from block
> layer.
> 
> Example of racing scenario: While UFS device is runtime-suspended
> 
> Thread #1: Executing UFS shutdown flow, e.g.,
>            ufshcd_suspend(UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM)
> Thread #2: Executing runtime resume flow triggered by I/O request,
>            e.g., ufshcd_resume(UFS_RUNTIME_PM)
> 
> This breaks the assumption that UFS PM flows can not be running
> concurrently and some unexpected racing behavior may happen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 59358bb75014..104173c03492 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,12 @@ struct ufs_pm_lvl_states ufs_pm_lvl_states[] = {
>  	{UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE, UIC_LINK_OFF_STATE},
>  };
>  
> +#define ufshcd_scsi_for_each_sdev(fn) \
> +	list_for_each_entry(starget, &hba->host->__targets, siblings) { \
> +		__starget_for_each_device(starget, NULL, \
> +					  fn); \
> +	}
> +
>  static inline enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode
>  ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(enum ufs_pm_level lvl)
>  {
> @@ -8588,6 +8594,19 @@ int ufshcd_runtime_idle(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ufshcd_runtime_idle);
>  
> +static void ufshcd_cleanup_queue(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data)
> +{
> +	if (sdev->request_queue)
> +		blk_cleanup_queue(sdev->request_queue);
> +}
> +
> +static void ufshcd_quiece_sdev(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data)
> +{
> +	/* Suspended devices are already quiecsed and shall be skipped */
> +	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(&sdev->sdev_gendev))
> +		scsi_device_quiesce(sdev);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * ufshcd_shutdown - shutdown routine
>   * @hba: per adapter instance
> @@ -8599,6 +8618,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ufshcd_runtime_idle);
>  int ufshcd_shutdown(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	struct scsi_target *starget;
>  
>  	if (!hba->is_powered)
>  		goto out;
> @@ -8612,7 +8632,25 @@ int ufshcd_shutdown(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>  			goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Quiesce all SCSI devices to prevent any non-PM requests sending
> +	 * from block layer during and after shutdown.
> +	 *
> +	 * Here we can not use blk_cleanup_queue() since PM requests
> +	 * (with BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT flag) are still required to be sent
> +	 * through block layer. Therefore SCSI command queued after the
> +	 * scsi_target_quiesce() call returned will block until
> +	 * blk_cleanup_queue() is called.
> +	 *
> +	 * Besides, scsi_target_"un"quiesce (e.g., scsi_target_resume) can
> +	 * be ignored since shutdown is one-way flow.
> +	 */
> +	ufshcd_scsi_for_each_sdev(ufshcd_quiece_sdev);
> +
>  	ret = ufshcd_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM);
> +
> +	/* Set queue as dying to not block queueing commands */
> +	ufshcd_scsi_for_each_sdev(ufshcd_cleanup_queue);
>  out:
>  	if (ret)
>  		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s failed, err %d\n", __func__, ret);