[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878sfntnoz.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:54:52 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: properly pad struct kvm_vmx_nested_state_hdr
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:28:24AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Holes in structs which are userspace ABI are undesireable.
>>
>> Fixes: 83d31e5271ac ("KVM: nVMX: fixes for preemption timer migration")
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> index 320788f81a05..7beccda11978 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
>> @@ -4345,7 +4345,7 @@ Errors:
>> struct {
>> __u16 flags;
>> } smm;
>> -
>> + __u16 pad;
>
> I don't think this is sufficient. Before 83d31e5271ac, the struct was:
>
Before 850448f35aaf. Thanks, I was too lazy to check that.
> struct kvm_vmx_nested_state_hdr {
> __u64 vmxon_pa;
> __u64 vmcs12_pa;
>
> struct {
> __u16 flags;
> } smm;
> };
>
> which most/all compilers will pad out to 24 bytes on a 64-bit system. And
> although smm.flags is padded to 8 bytes, it's initialized as a 2 byte value.
>
> 714 struct kvm_vmx_nested_state_hdr boo;
> 715 u64 val;
> 716
> 717 BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(boo) != 3*8);
> 718 boo.smm.flags = 0;
> 0xffffffff810148a9 <+41>: xor %eax,%eax
> 0xffffffff810148ab <+43>: mov %ax,0x18(%rsp)
>
> 719
> 720 val = *((volatile u64 *)(&boo.smm.flags));
> 0xffffffff810148b0 <+48>: mov 0x18(%rsp),%rax
>
>
> Which means that userspace built for the old kernel will potentially send in
> garbage for the new 'flags' field due to it being uninitialized stack data,
> even with the layout after this patch.
>
> struct kvm_vmx_nested_state_hdr {
> __u64 vmxon_pa;
> __u64 vmcs12_pa;
>
> struct {
> __u16 flags;
> } smm;
> __u16 pad;
> __u32 flags;
> __u64 preemption_timer_deadline;
> };
>
> So to be backwards compatible I believe we need to add a __u32 pad as well,
> and to not cause internal padding issues, either make the new 'flags' a
> __u64 or pad that as well (or add and check a reserved __32). Making flags
> a __64 seems like the least wasteful approach, e.g.
>
> struct kvm_vmx_nested_state_hdr {
> __u64 vmxon_pa;
> __u64 vmcs12_pa;
>
> struct {
> __u16 flags;
> } smm;
> __u16 pad16;
> __u32 pad32;
> __u64 flags;
> __u64 preemption_timer_deadline;
> };
I see and I agree but the fix like that needs to get into 5.8 or an ABI
breakage is guaranteed. I'll send v2 immediately, hope Paolo will take a
look.
>
>
>> __u32 flags;
>> __u64 preemption_timer_deadline;
>> };
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 0780f97c1850..aae3df1cbd01 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ struct kvm_vmx_nested_state_hdr {
>> struct {
>> __u16 flags;
>> } smm;
>> -
>> + __u16 pad;
>> __u32 flags;
>> __u64 preemption_timer_deadline;
>> };
>> --
>> 2.25.4
>>
>
--
Vitaly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists