[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpegvU2JQcNM+0mcMPk-_e==RcT0xjqYUHCTzx3g0oCw6RiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:14:16 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Maxim Patlasov <maximvp@...il.com>,
Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse_writepages_fill() optimization to avoid WARN_ON in tree_insert
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:02 AM Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/11/20 7:01 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:02 AM Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> In current implementation fuse_writepages_fill() tries to share the code:
> >> for new wpa it calls tree_insert() with num_pages = 0
> >> then switches to common code used non-modified num_pages
> >> and increments it at the very end.
> >>
> >> Though it triggers WARN_ON(!wpa->ia.ap.num_pages) in tree_insert()
> >> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 17211 at fs/fuse/file.c:1728 tree_insert+0xab/0xc0 [fuse]
> >> RIP: 0010:tree_insert+0xab/0xc0 [fuse]
> >> Call Trace:
> >> fuse_writepages_fill+0x5da/0x6a0 [fuse]
> >> write_cache_pages+0x171/0x470
> >> fuse_writepages+0x8a/0x100 [fuse]
> >> do_writepages+0x43/0xe0
> >>
> >> This patch re-works fuse_writepages_fill() to call tree_insert()
> >> with num_pages = 1 and avoids its subsequent increment and
> >> an extra spin_lock(&fi->lock) for newly added wpa.
> >
> > Looks good. However, I don't like the way fuse_writepage_in_flight()
> > is silently changed to insert page into the rb_tree. Also the
> > insertion can be merged with the search for in-flight and be done
> > unconditionally to simplify the logic. See attached patch.
>
> Your patch looks correct for me except 2 things:
Thanks for reviewing.
> 1) you have lost "data->wpa = NULL;" when fuse_writepage_add() returns false.
This is intentional, because this is in the !data->wpa branch.
> 2) in the same case old code did not set data->orig_pages[ap->num_pages] = page;
That is also intentional, in this case the origi_pages[0] is either
overwritten with the next page or discarded due to data->wpa being
NULL.
I'll write these up in the patch header.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists