[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200713213605.GA766184@bogus>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:36:05 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, will@...nel.org,
joro@...tes.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com, hannah@...vell.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
nadavh@...vell.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
mw@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: add compatible string for
Marvell Armada-AP806 SMMU-500
On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 11:26:32AM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> On 03.07.2020 11:05, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2020-07-02 21:16, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:
> > > Add specific compatible string for Marvell usage due to errata of
> > > accessing 64bits registers of ARM SMMU, in AP806.
> > >
> > > AP806 SoC uses the generic ARM-MMU500, and there's no specific
> > > implementation of Marvell, this compatible is used for errata only.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hanna Hawa <hannah@...vell.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 5 +++++
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> > > index d7ceb4c34423..7beca9c00b12 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> > > @@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ properties:
> > > - qcom,sc7180-smmu-500
> > > - qcom,sdm845-smmu-500
> > > - const: arm,mmu-500
> > > + - description: Marvell SoCs implementing "arm,mmu-500"
> > > + items:
> > > + - enum:
> > > + - marvell,ap806-smmu-500
> >
> > Isn't a single-valued enum just a constant? :P
>
> That's how copy-paste engineering ends up :)
It's fine like this if you expect more SoCs to be added.
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists