[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200713053932.GB956284@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:39:32 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] kprobes: Remove MODULES dependency
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 07:32:57PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 02:45:19 +0300
> Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Remove MODULES dependency and migrate from module_alloc to vmalloc().
> > According to Andi, the history with this dependency is that kprobes
> > originally required custom LKM's, which does not hold today anymore.
> >
> > Right now one has to compile LKM support only to enable kprobes. With
> > this change applied, it is somewhat easier to create custom test
> > kernel's with a proper debugging capabilities, thus making Linux more
> > developer friendly.
>
> Agreed. Now we have several way to access kprobes via ftrace/perf/bpf
> without modules. So it's a good time to remove CONFIG_MODULE dependency.
>
> But I also would like to minimize the changes for code readability.
> I made some comments below.
Thanks, appreciate this.
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/Kconfig | 1 -
> > arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 5 +++--
> > kernel/kprobes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> > index 8cc35dc556c7..bb59cdf335ab 100644
> > --- a/arch/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> > @@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ config OPROFILE_NMI_TIMER
> >
> > config KPROBES
> > bool "Kprobes"
> > - depends on MODULES
> > depends on HAVE_KPROBES
> > select KALLSYMS
> > help
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > index ada39ddbc922..dc7b8d6fd20d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
> > #include <linux/moduleloader.h>
> > #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> > +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/text-patching.h>
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > @@ -423,7 +424,7 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void)
> > {
> > void *page;
> >
> > - page = module_alloc(PAGE_SIZE);
> > + page = vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE);
>
> No, you can not use vmalloc here. The reason why we use module_alloc()
> is to allocate the executable memory for trampoline code.
> So, you need to use vmalloc_exec() instead.
Right, I'm on the wagon with this after reading Peter's explanation.
>
> > if (!page)
> > return NULL;
> >
> > @@ -446,7 +447,7 @@ void *alloc_insn_page(void)
> > /* Recover page to RW mode before releasing it */
> > void free_insn_page(void *page)
> > {
> > - module_memfree(page);
> > + vfree(page);
> > }
> >
> > static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index 4a904cc56d68..02680642ea11 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> > #include <linux/ftrace.h>
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> > +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> >
> > #include <asm/sections.h>
> > #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> > @@ -111,12 +112,12 @@ enum kprobe_slot_state {
> >
> > void __weak *alloc_insn_page(void)
> > {
> > - return module_alloc(PAGE_SIZE);
> > + return vmalloc(PAGE_SIZE);
>
> Ditto.
>
> > }
> >
> > void __weak free_insn_page(void *page)
> > {
> > - module_memfree(page);
> > + vfree(page);
> > }
> >
> > struct kprobe_insn_cache kprobe_insn_slots = {
> > @@ -563,8 +564,11 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
> > mutex_lock(&kprobe_mutex);
> > cpus_read_lock();
> > mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > /* Lock modules while optimizing kprobes */
> > mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> > +#endif
>
> Hmm, can you reduce these "#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE"s ?
>
> e.g.
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> static void lock_modules(void)
> {
> mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> }
> ...
> #else
> #define lock_modules() do { } while (0)
> ...
> #endif
Yes, I'll use this idea also to address to issues reported below.
>
> >
> > /*
> > * Step 1: Unoptimize kprobes and collect cleaned (unused and disarmed)
> > @@ -589,7 +593,9 @@ static void kprobe_optimizer(struct work_struct *work)
> > /* Step 4: Free cleaned kprobes after quiesence period */
> > do_free_cleaned_kprobes();
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> > mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> > +#endif
> > mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > cpus_read_unlock();
> >
> > @@ -739,6 +745,7 @@ static int reuse_unused_kprobe(struct kprobe *ap)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > /* Remove optimized instructions */
> > static void kill_optimized_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > {
> > @@ -764,6 +771,7 @@ static void kill_optimized_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > /* Don't touch the code, because it is already freed. */
> > arch_remove_optimized_kprobe(op);
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> This optprobe related one is OK to keep in this place.
>
> >
> > static inline
> > void __prepare_optimized_kprobe(struct optimized_kprobe *op, struct kprobe *p)
> > @@ -1608,6 +1616,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> > goto out;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > /*
> > * If the module freed .init.text, we couldn't insert
> > * kprobes in there.
> > @@ -1618,6 +1627,7 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
> > *probed_mod = NULL;
> > ret = -ENOENT;
> > }
> > +#endif
> > }
> > out:
> > preempt_enable();
> > @@ -2090,6 +2100,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(pre_handler_kretprobe);
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_KRETPROBES */
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > /* Set the kprobe gone and remove its instruction buffer. */
> > static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > {
> > @@ -2114,6 +2125,7 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> > */
> > arch_remove_kprobe(p);
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > /* Disable one kprobe */
> > int disable_kprobe(struct kprobe *kp)
> > @@ -2214,6 +2226,7 @@ int kprobe_add_area_blacklist(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > /* Remove all symbols in given area from kprobe blacklist */
> > static void kprobe_remove_area_blacklist(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > {
> > @@ -2231,6 +2244,7 @@ static void kprobe_remove_ksym_blacklist(unsigned long entry)
> > {
> > kprobe_remove_area_blacklist(entry, entry + 1);
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > int __init __weak arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
> > {
> > @@ -2274,6 +2288,7 @@ static int __init populate_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long *start,
> > return ret ? : arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist();
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > static void add_module_kprobe_blacklist(struct module *mod)
> > {
> > unsigned long start, end;
> > @@ -2375,6 +2390,7 @@ static struct notifier_block kprobe_module_nb = {
> > .notifier_call = kprobes_module_callback,
> > .priority = 0
> > };
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULE */
> >
> > /* Markers of _kprobe_blacklist section */
> > extern unsigned long __start_kprobe_blacklist[];
> > @@ -2425,8 +2441,10 @@ static int __init init_kprobes(void)
> > err = arch_init_kprobes();
> > if (!err)
> > err = register_die_notifier(&kprobe_exceptions_nb);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > if (!err)
> > err = register_module_notifier(&kprobe_module_nb);
> > +#endif
> >
> > kprobes_initialized = (err == 0);
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > index aefb6065b508..30969b38fce8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> > @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_has_gone(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> > return !!(kprobe_gone(&tk->rp.kp));
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_within_module(struct trace_kprobe *tk,
> > struct module *mod)
> > {
> > @@ -110,7 +111,9 @@ static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_within_module(struct trace_kprobe *tk,
> > const char *name = trace_kprobe_symbol(tk);
> > return strncmp(mod->name, name, len) == 0 && name[len] == ':';
> > }
> > +#endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_module_exist(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> > {
> > char *p;
> > @@ -129,6 +132,7 @@ static nokprobe_inline bool trace_kprobe_module_exist(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> Here, too. If you make a dummy function in case of !CONFIG_MODULE,
> we don't need to modify caller-side code.
>
> >
> > static bool trace_kprobe_is_busy(struct dyn_event *ev)
> > {
> > @@ -608,10 +612,12 @@ static int append_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk, struct trace_kprobe *to)
> >
> > /* Register k*probe */
> > ret = __register_trace_kprobe(tk);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > if (ret == -ENOENT && !trace_kprobe_module_exist(tk)) {
> > pr_warn("This probe might be able to register after target module is loaded. Continue.\n");
> > ret = 0;
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> So, please make a dummy trace_kprobe_module_exist() and keep this untouched.
>
> >
> > if (ret)
> > trace_probe_unlink(&tk->tp);
> > @@ -651,10 +657,12 @@ static int register_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> >
> > /* Register k*probe */
> > ret = __register_trace_kprobe(tk);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > if (ret == -ENOENT && !trace_kprobe_module_exist(tk)) {
> > pr_warn("This probe might be able to register after target module is loaded. Continue.\n");
> > ret = 0;
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> Ditto.
>
> >
> > if (ret < 0)
> > unregister_kprobe_event(tk);
> > @@ -666,6 +674,7 @@ static int register_trace_kprobe(struct trace_kprobe *tk)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > /* Module notifier call back, checking event on the module */
> > static int trace_kprobe_module_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> > unsigned long val, void *data)
> > @@ -700,6 +709,7 @@ static struct notifier_block trace_kprobe_module_nb = {
> > .notifier_call = trace_kprobe_module_callback,
> > .priority = 1 /* Invoked after kprobe module callback */
> > };
> > +#endif
>
> Unless it makes any build error, please keep it untouched.
>
> >
> > /* Convert certain expected symbols into '_' when generating event names */
> > static inline void sanitize_event_name(char *name)
> > @@ -1891,8 +1901,10 @@ static __init int init_kprobe_trace_early(void)
> > if (ret)
> > return ret;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULE
> > if (register_module_notifier(&trace_kprobe_module_nb))
> > return -EINVAL;
> > +#endif
>
> Ditto.
>
> Thank you,
Thanks a lot for the remarks.
>
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists