[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200713060800.GA15400@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:08:00 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support
Hi Peter,
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf cap_user_time situation.
I checked the latest mainline kernel code base, found this patch set
are missed to merge into it.
Could you confirm if this is missed or any other reasons to hold on it?
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists