linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:08:00 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support

Hi Peter,

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf cap_user_time situation.

I checked the latest mainline kernel code base, found this patch set
are missed to merge into it.

Could you confirm if this is missed or any other reasons to hold on it?

Thanks,
Leo