linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: mt6360: Refactor and fix code style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:51:10 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc:     Gene Chen <gene.chen.richtek@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gene_chen@...htek.com, shufan_lee@...htek.com,
        cy_huang@...htek.com, benjamin.chao@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: mt6360: Refactor and fix code style

On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:

> 
> 
> On 07/07/2020 12:30, Gene Chen wrote:
> > From: Gene Chen <gene_chen@...htek.com>
> > 
> > Rearrange include file.
> > Remove brackets around raw numbers.
> > Indicate sub-dev compatible name by using "-"
> > Combine mt6360 pmic/ldo resouces into mt6360 regulator resources.
> > Rename mt6360_pmu_data by mt6360_data.
> > Rename mt6360_pmu by mt6360.
> 
> That seems like a lot of cosmetics. Why is this needed?
> If you think that's needed it should be split up in different commits, each
> explaining in the commit message why you do that.

Agreed.  This set is still not broken up enough.

Please place each logical change into its own patch for review.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog