[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <26112734.125046.1594626171647.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 09:42:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, dan j williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] kernfs: Allow vm_ops->close() if VMA is never
split
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "richard" <richard@....at>
> An: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> CC: tj@...nel.org, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, ebiederm@...ssion.com, "dan j williams"
> <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "richard" <richard@....at>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 4. Juli 2020 22:56:19
> Betreff: [PATCH] [RFC] kernfs: Allow vm_ops->close() if VMA is never split
> 10 years ago commit a6849fa1f7d7 ("sysfs: Fail bin file mmap if vma close is
> implemented.")
> removed support for vm_ops->close() for mmap on sysfs.
> As far I understand the reason is that due to the wrapping in kernfs
> every VMA split operation needs to be tracked to call vm_ops->close()
> for all fragments. This is not feasible with reasonable effort.
>
> Since commit 31383c6865a5 ("mm, hugetlbfs: introduce ->split() to
> vm_operations_struct")
> we can get notified as soon a VMA is split, this can help to relax the
> restriction.
> So I propose to allow having a custom close under the condition that a
> VMA cannot get split.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
*friendly ping*
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists