| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAFv8NwJPSs+z1qbBR0+73xS9nqSZ5ENmqhug45+CLPfQVHVU_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 19:19:01 +0800
From: Cheng-yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, ilina@...eaurora.org,
agross@...nel.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org, mkshah@...eaurora.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: qcom: Handle broken PDC dual edge case on sc7180
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 5:16 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> As per Qualcomm, there is a PDC hardware issue (with the specific IP
> rev that exists on sc7180) that causes the PDC not to work properly
> when configured to handle dual edges.
>
> Let's work around this by emulating only ever letting our parent see
> requests for single edge interrupts on affected hardware.
>
> Fixes: e35a6ae0eb3a ("pinctrl/msm: Setup GPIO chip in hierarchy")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Tested-by: Cheng-Yi Chiang <cychiang@...omium.org>
>
> ---
> As far as I can tell everything here should work and the limited
> testing I'm able to give it shows that, in fact, I can detect both
> edges.
>
> Please give this an extra thorough review since it's trying to find
> the exact right place to insert this code and I'm not massively
> familiar with all the frameworks.
>
> If someone has hardware where it's easy to stress test this that'd be
> wonderful too. The board I happen to have in front of me doesn't have
> any easy-to-toggle GPIOs where I can just poke a button or a switch to
> generate edges. My testing was done by hacking the "write protect"
> GPIO on my board into gpio-keys as a dual-edge interrupt and then
> sending commands to our security chip to toggle it--not exactly great
> for testing to make sure there are no race conditions if the interrupt
> bounces a lot.
>
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h | 4 ++
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc7180.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 85 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> index 83b7d64bc4c1..45ca09ebb7b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.c
> @@ -860,6 +860,79 @@ static void msm_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_parent() - Prime next edge for IRQs handled by parent.
> + * @d: The irq dta.
> + *
> + * This is much like msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_pos() but for IRQs that are
> + * normally handled by the parent irqchip. The logic here is slightly
> + * different due to what's easy to do with our parent, but in principle it's
> + * the same.
> + */
> +static void msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_parent(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + const struct msm_pingroup *g = &pctrl->soc->groups[d->hwirq];
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int loop_limit = 100;
> + unsigned int val;
> + unsigned int type;
> +
> + /* Read the value and make a guess about what edge we need to catch */
> + val = msm_readl_io(pctrl, g) & BIT(g->in_bit);
> + type = val ? IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING : IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
> + do {
> + /* Set the parent to catch the next edge */
> + irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);
> +
> + /*
> + * Possibly the line changed between when we last read "val"
> + * (and decided what edge we needed) and when set the edge.
> + * If the value didn't change (or changed and then changed
> + * back) then we're done.
> + */
> + val = msm_readl_io(pctrl, g) & BIT(g->in_bit);
> + if (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) {
> + if (!val)
> + break;
> + type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING;
> + } else if (type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING) {
> + if (val)
> + break;
> + type = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
> + }
> + } while (loop_limit-- > 0);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pctrl->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (!loop_limit)
> + dev_err(pctrl->dev, "dual-edge irq failed to stabilize\n");
> +}
> +
> +void msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *d = &desc->irq_data;
> +
> + /* Make sure we're primed for the next edge */
> + msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_parent(d);
> +
> + /* Pass on to the normal interrupt handler */
> + handle_fasteoi_irq(desc);
> +}
> +
> +static bool msm_gpio_needs_dual_edge_parent_workaround(struct irq_data *d,
> + unsigned int type)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + struct msm_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> +
> + return type == IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH &&
> + pctrl->soc->wakeirq_dual_edge_errata && d->parent_data &&
> + test_bit(d->hwirq, pctrl->skip_wake_irqs);
> +}
> +
> static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> {
> struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> @@ -868,6 +941,13 @@ static int msm_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
> unsigned long flags;
> u32 val;
>
> + if (msm_gpio_needs_dual_edge_parent_workaround(d, type)) {
> + irq_set_handler_locked(d, msm_gpio_handle_dual_edge_parent_irq);
> + msm_gpio_update_dual_edge_parent(d);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> if (d->parent_data)
> irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
> index 9452da18a78b..7486fe08eb9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-msm.h
> @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map {
> * @pull_no_keeper: The SoC does not support keeper bias.
> * @wakeirq_map: The map of wakeup capable GPIOs and the pin at PDC/MPM
> * @nwakeirq_map: The number of entries in @wakeirq_map
> + * @wakeirq_dual_edge_errata: If true then GPIOs using the wakeirq_map need
> + * to be aware that their parent can't handle dual
> + * edge interrupts.
> */
> struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data {
> const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
> @@ -128,6 +131,7 @@ struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data {
> const int *reserved_gpios;
> const struct msm_gpio_wakeirq_map *wakeirq_map;
> unsigned int nwakeirq_map;
> + bool wakeirq_dual_edge_errata;
> };
>
> extern const struct dev_pm_ops msm_pinctrl_dev_pm_ops;
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc7180.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc7180.c
> index 1b6465a882f2..1d9acad3c1ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc7180.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-sc7180.c
> @@ -1147,6 +1147,7 @@ static const struct msm_pinctrl_soc_data sc7180_pinctrl = {
> .ntiles = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_tiles),
> .wakeirq_map = sc7180_pdc_map,
> .nwakeirq_map = ARRAY_SIZE(sc7180_pdc_map),
> + .wakeirq_dual_edge_errata = true,
> };
>
> static int sc7180_pinctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.27.0.383.g050319c2ae-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists