[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200713125839.GB6660@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:58:39 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
sboyd@...eaurora.org, john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support
Hi Will,
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:11:56AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:08:00PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf cap_user_time situation.
> >
> > I checked the latest mainline kernel code base, found this patch set
> > are missed to merge into it.
> >
> > Could you confirm if this is missed or any other reasons to hold on it?
>
> I was assuming you were going to pick them up, fix up the issues found
> by you and kbuild robot and then post a full series after testing.
Understand now, will rebase the patch set and verify it with SPE
timestamp related changes.
Thanks,
Leo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists