linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 20:58:39 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        sboyd@...eaurora.org, john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] arm64: perf: Proper cap_user_time* support

Hi Will,

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:11:56AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Leo,
> 
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 02:08:00PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:40:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Prompted by Leo's patches, here a series that corrects the arm64 perf cap_user_time situation.
> > 
> > I checked the latest mainline kernel code base, found this patch set
> > are missed to merge into it.
> > 
> > Could you confirm if this is missed or any other reasons to hold on it?
> 
> I was assuming you were going to pick them up, fix up the issues found
> by you and kbuild robot and then post a full series after testing.

Understand now, will rebase the patch set and verify it with SPE
timestamp related changes.

Thanks,
Leo