linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] uaccess: add force_uaccess

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUCmEeU0G9wkUxZKm5tC9YoB-KXSSCLKwpSia746Myebw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:19:42 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
        Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] uaccess: add force_uaccess_{begin,end} helpers

Hi Mark,

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 2:21 PM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 03:57:05PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Add helpers to wraper the get_fs/set_fs magic for undoing any damange
> > done by set_fs(KERNEL_DS).  There is no real functional benefit, but this
> > documents the intent of these calls better, and will allow stubbing the
> > functions out easily for kernels builds that do not allow address space
> > overrides in the future.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > index 191e75a6bb249e..30471549e1e224 100644
> > --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> > @@ -13,13 +13,13 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_page(void *addr)
> >       if (CPU_IS_COLDFIRE) {
> >               mmu_write(MMUOR, MMUOR_CNL);
> >       } else if (CPU_IS_040_OR_060) {
> > -             mm_segment_t old_fs = get_fs();
> > -             set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
> > +             mm_segment_t old_fs = force_uaccess_begin();
> > +
>
> This used to set KERNEL_DS, and now it sets USER_DS, which looks wrong
> superficially.

Thanks for noticing, and sorry for missing that myself.

The same issue is present for SuperH:

    -               set_fs(KERNEL_DS);
    +               oldfs = force_uaccess_begin();

So the patch description should be:

    "Add helpers to wraper the get_fs/set_fs magic for undoing any damage
     done by set_fs(USER_DS)."

and leave alone users setting KERNEL_DS?

> If the new behaviour is fine it suggests that the old behaviour was
> wrong, or that this is superfluous and could go entirely.
>
> Geert?

Nope, on m68k, TLB cache operations operate on the current address space.
Hence to flush a kernel TLB entry, you have to switch to KERNEL_DS first.

If we're guaranteed to be already using KERNEL_DS, I guess the
address space handling can be removed.  But can we be sure?


> >               __asm__ __volatile__(".chip 68040\n\t"
> >                                    "pflush (%0)\n\t"
> >                                    ".chip 68k"
> >                                    : : "a" (addr));
> > -             set_fs(old_fs);
> > +             force_uaccess_end(old_fs);
> >       } else if (CPU_IS_020_OR_030)
> >               __asm__ __volatile__("pflush #4,#4,(%0)" : : "a" (addr));
>
> > +/*
> > + * Force the uaccess routines to be wired up for actual userspace access,
> > + * overriding any possible set_fs(KERNEL_DS) still lingering around.  Undone
> > + * using force_uaccess_end below.
> > + */
> > +static inline mm_segment_t force_uaccess_begin(void)
> > +{
> > +     mm_segment_t fs = get_fs();
> > +
> > +     set_fs(USER_DS);
> > +     return fs;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void force_uaccess_end(mm_segment_t oldfs)
> > +{
> > +     set_fs(oldfs);
> > +}

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds