[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKC5WtHb-coMCxMTDJ7CJcjVXcAxDT4J9N-Xyr=0uuURA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 08:11:07 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] drm/msm: Avoid possible infinite probe deferral and
speed booting
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:02 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> I found that if I ever had a little mistake in my kernel config,
> or device tree, or graphics driver that my system would sit in a loop
> at bootup trying again and again and again. An example log was:
Why do we care about optimizing the error case?
> msm ae00000.mdss: bound ae01000.mdp (ops 0xffffffe596e951f8)
> msm_dsi ae94000.dsi: ae94000.dsi supply gdsc not found, using dummy regulator
> msm_dsi_manager_register: failed to register mipi dsi host for DSI 0
> [drm:ti_sn_bridge_probe] *ERROR* could not find any panel node
> ...
>
> I finally tracked it down where this was happening:
> - msm_pdev_probe() is called.
> - msm_pdev_probe() registers drivers. Registering drivers kicks
> off processing of probe deferrals.
> - component_master_add_with_match() could return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> making msm_pdev_probe() return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> - When msm_pdev_probe() returned the processing of probe deferrals
> happens.
> - Loop back to the start.
>
> It looks like we can fix this by marking "mdss" as a "simple-bus".
> I have no idea if people consider this the right thing to do or a
> hack. Hopefully it's the right thing to do. :-)
It's a simple test. Do the child devices have any dependency on the
parent to probe and/or function? If so, not a simple-bus.
> Once I do this I notice that my boot gets marginally faster (you
> don't need to probe the sub devices over and over) and also if I
Can you quantify that?
Have you run with devlinks enabled. You need a command line option to
enable. That too should reduce deferred probes.
> have a problem it doesn't loop forever (on my system it still
> gets upset about some stuck clocks in that case, but at least I
> can boot up).
Deferred probe only runs when a device is added, so it's not like it
is continually running.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists