[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1594609574.23885.35.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:06:14 +0800
From: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: bdc: use readl_poll_timeout() to simplify
code
On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 16:37 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Chunfeng Yun (2020-07-09 20:30:56)
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c
> > index 02a3a77..fa173de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c
> > @@ -32,21 +33,14 @@
> > static int poll_oip(struct bdc *bdc, int usec)
>
> Can we change usec to unsigned? Not sure why negative time is important.
Yes, it's sensible to use unsigned.
>
> > {
> > u32 status;
> > - /* Poll till STS!= OIP */
> > - while (usec) {
> > - status = bdc_readl(bdc->regs, BDC_BDCSC);
> > - if (BDC_CSTS(status) != BDC_OIP) {
> > - dev_dbg(bdc->dev,
> > - "poll_oip complete status=%d",
> > - BDC_CSTS(status));
>
> This debug message was lost in the conversion. Any reason?
No, will add it back
>
> > - return 0;
> > - }
> > - udelay(10);
> > - usec -= 10;
> > - }
> > - dev_err(bdc->dev, "Err: operation timedout BDCSC: 0x%08x\n", status);
> > + int ret;
> >
> > - return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout(bdc->regs + BDC_BDCSC, status,
> > + (BDC_CSTS(status) != BDC_OIP), 10, usec);
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err(bdc->dev, "Err: operation timedout BDCSC: 0x%08x\n", status);
>
> Please drop "Err:" as we have kernel log levels (i.e. dev_err() used
> here) for that.
Ok
Thanks
>
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists