[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200714155304.6isfmpwhbqnh57kr@soft-dev3.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:53:04 +0200
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <jiri@...nulli.us>, <ivecera@...hat.com>,
<andrew@...n.ch>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 12/12] net: bridge: Add port attribute
IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_IN_OPEN
The 07/14/2020 18:33, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 14/07/2020 18:07, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The 07/14/2020 16:29, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>
> >> On 14/07/2020 10:34, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> >>> This patch adds a new port attribute, IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_IN_OPEN, which
> >>> allows to notify the userspace when the node lost the contiuity of
> >>> MRP_InTest frames.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> >>> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 3 +++
> >>> tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> >>> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >
> > Hi Nik,
> >
> >>
> >> It's kind of late by now, but I'd wish these were contained in a nested MRP attribute. :)
> >> Horatiu, do you expect to have many more MRP attributes outside of MRP netlink code?
> >
> > I don't expect to add any other MRP attributes outside of MRP netlink
> > code.
> >
> >>
> >> Perhaps we should at least dump them only for MRP-aware ports, that should be easy.
> >> They make no sense outside of MRP anyway, but increase the size of the dump for all
> >> right now.
> >
> > You are right. Then should I first send a fix on the net for this and
> > after that I will fix these patches or just fix this in the next patch
> > series?
> >
>
> IMO it's more of an improvement rather than a bug, but since you don't expect to have more
> attributes outside of MRP's netlink I guess we can drop it for now. Up to you.
OK, lets just drop it for now.
>
> It definitely shouldn't block this patch-set.
>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
> >>
> >>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> index cc185a007ade8..26842ffd0501d 100644
> >>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum {
> >>> IFLA_BRPORT_ISOLATED,
> >>> IFLA_BRPORT_BACKUP_PORT,
> >>> IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_RING_OPEN,
> >>> + IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_IN_OPEN,
> >>> __IFLA_BRPORT_MAX
> >>> };
> >>> #define IFLA_BRPORT_MAX (__IFLA_BRPORT_MAX - 1)
> >>> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> >>> index c532fa65c9834..147d52596e174 100644
> >>> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> >>> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> >>> @@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ static inline size_t br_port_info_size(void)
> >>> #endif
> >>> + nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)) /* IFLA_BRPORT_GROUP_FWD_MASK */
> >>> + nla_total_size(sizeof(u8)) /* IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_RING_OPEN */
> >>> + + nla_total_size(sizeof(u8)) /* IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_IN_OPEN */
> >>> + 0;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> @@ -216,6 +217,8 @@ static int br_port_fill_attrs(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >>> !!(p->flags & BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS)) ||
> >>> nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_RING_OPEN, !!(p->flags &
> >>> BR_MRP_LOST_CONT)) ||
> >>> + nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_IN_OPEN,
> >>> + !!(p->flags & BR_MRP_LOST_IN_CONT)) ||
> >>> nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_ISOLATED, !!(p->flags & BR_ISOLATED)))
> >>> return -EMSGSIZE;
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> index cafedbbfefbe9..781e482dc499f 100644
> >>> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> >>> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum {
> >>> IFLA_BRPORT_ISOLATED,
> >>> IFLA_BRPORT_BACKUP_PORT,
> >>> IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_RING_OPEN,
> >>> + IFLA_BRPORT_MRP_IN_OPEN,
> >>> __IFLA_BRPORT_MAX
> >>> };
> >>> #define IFLA_BRPORT_MAX (__IFLA_BRPORT_MAX - 1)
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists