[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b2f7674-9e33-e09c-cf99-84c59edb9779@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 17:20:54 +0100
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Denis Sadykov <denis.m.sadykov@...el.com>,
Andy Grover <andrew.grover@...el.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Diefenbaugh <paul.s.diefenbaugh@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...do.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Take 'dummy' principle one
stage further
On 2020-07-14 17:03, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:51 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> If we fail to use a variable, even a 'dummy' one, then the compiler
>> complains that it is set but not used. We know this is fine, so we
>> set it to its own value here.
>
> Which is kind of ugly in my personal view. I hope that the compiler
> will actually optimize the extra code away ...
>
>> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
>
> Well, "Makes the following ... warning(s) go away:" rather ...
Isn't that what we have __maybe_unused and __always_unused for?
Robin.
>> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: In function ‘cpu_freq_read_intel’:
>> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:247:11: warning: variable ‘dummy’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c: In function ‘cpu_freq_read_amd’:
>> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:265:11: warning: variable ‘dummy’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>>
>> Cc: Andy Grover <andrew.grover@...el.com>
>> Cc: Paul Diefenbaugh <paul.s.diefenbaugh@...el.com>
>> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...do.de>
>> Cc: Denis Sadykov <denis.m.sadykov@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> index 429e5a36c08a9..d38a693b48e03 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -247,6 +247,7 @@ static u32 cpu_freq_read_intel(struct acpi_pct_register *not_used)
>> u32 val, dummy;
>>
>> rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL, val, dummy);
>> + dummy &= dummy; /* Silence set but not used warning */
>> return val;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ static u32 cpu_freq_read_amd(struct acpi_pct_register *not_used)
>> u32 val, dummy;
>>
>> rdmsr(MSR_AMD_PERF_CTL, val, dummy);
>> + dummy &= dummy; /* Silence set but not used warning */
>> return val;
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists