linux-kernel - Re: [v1] drm/msm/dpu: add support for clk and bw scaling for display

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:14 -0700
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     kalyan_t@...eaurora.org
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com,
        seanpaul@...omium.org, hoegsberg@...omium.org,
        dianders@...omium.org, mkrishn@...eaurora.org,
        travitej@...eaurora.org, nganji@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [v1] drm/msm/dpu: add support for clk and bw scaling for display

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 04:39:47PM +0530, kalyan_t@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-07-14 06:42, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:38:41PM +0530, Kalyan Thota wrote:
> > > This change adds support to scale src clk and bandwidth as
> > > per composition requirements.
> > > 
> > > Interconnect registration for bw has been moved to mdp
> > > device node from mdss to facilitate the scaling.
> > > 
> > > Changes in v1:
> > >  - Address armv7 compilation issues with the patch (Rob)
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>
> > 
> > It seems this is an evolution of this series:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=265351
> > 
> > Are the DT bits of the series still valid? If so please include them in
> > the
> > series, otherwise please add DT patches to allow folks to test and
> > review,
> > and get them landed in Bjorn's tree after the driver changes have
> > landed.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Yes the patch is dependent on the DT changes, should i add them with depends
> tag in the commit text ?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11470785/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11470789/

This patch doesn't really depend on the DT changes. I would suggest to
make this a series of 3 patches, just like the original series linked
above.