[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200714162314.GR3191083@google.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 09:23:14 -0700
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: kalyan_t@...eaurora.org
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robdclark@...il.com,
seanpaul@...omium.org, hoegsberg@...omium.org,
dianders@...omium.org, mkrishn@...eaurora.org,
travitej@...eaurora.org, nganji@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [v1] drm/msm/dpu: add support for clk and bw scaling for display
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 04:39:47PM +0530, kalyan_t@...eaurora.org wrote:
> On 2020-07-14 06:42, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 07:38:41PM +0530, Kalyan Thota wrote:
> > > This change adds support to scale src clk and bandwidth as
> > > per composition requirements.
> > >
> > > Interconnect registration for bw has been moved to mdp
> > > device node from mdss to facilitate the scaling.
> > >
> > > Changes in v1:
> > > - Address armv7 compilation issues with the patch (Rob)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kalyan Thota <kalyan_t@...eaurora.org>
> >
> > It seems this is an evolution of this series:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/list/?series=265351
> >
> > Are the DT bits of the series still valid? If so please include them in
> > the
> > series, otherwise please add DT patches to allow folks to test and
> > review,
> > and get them landed in Bjorn's tree after the driver changes have
> > landed.
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes the patch is dependent on the DT changes, should i add them with depends
> tag in the commit text ?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11470785/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11470789/
This patch doesn't really depend on the DT changes. I would suggest to
make this a series of 3 patches, just like the original series linked
above.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists